Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Book ending this week with a couple work trips to Dallas, so I have had a bit of extra time on the flights to read through some great articles.  I would highlight the lack of action on Alexander Acosta's nomination to become to next Labor Secretary.  However, with Congress not having voted on the nomination before they left for their two week break, there is little to discuss about that topic for the time being.  With that being said, an article that addressed how President Trump's 'infamous' tape is now part of the 21st Century Fox's HR training program was quite interesting (& perhaps timely for those in the HR field).

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


21st Century Fox Utilizes President Trump's Tape in its HR Program

Back in October, readers might recall a certain tape that leaked in which then presidential candidate Donald Trump made some off color comments in regard to women.  What was dubbed 'locker room talk' threatened his candidacy and became news fodder over subsequent days.  After all that, it appears that 21st Century Fox's HR department has started to utilize this tape in its HR programs, specifically in regard to what not to say or do in the workplace.  Interesting, to say the least, that President Trump has become a key focal point in corporate HR programs...


USAA Raises Hourly Wage Rates & Introduces New Parental Leave Policy

Earlier this week it was announced that USAA is raising its hourly wage rates to $16/hour (well above the federal minimum wage rate of $7.25/hour) and will also offer its employees 12 weeks of paid time off when a child is born or adopted.  To call this move unprecedented is a bit of an understatement.  While the "Fight for $15" movement has been prevalent throughout the country, seeing wages rise to $16/hour with this company is quite the jump (and could it be a catalyst for other companies to follow suit?)  Of course, that is not even mentioning the generous paid parental leave policy that will go into effect in July.  While other companies have taken steps to raise wage rates or offer expanded parental leave plans, this is certainly a one-two punch to tackle two major issues at once.


The "Fight for $15" Movement Faces Continued Struggle

Speaking of the "Fight for $15" movement, Michael Saltsman wrote an article for CNBC in which he makes the argument that while states are continuing to record victories against the "Fight for $15" movement, it appears this minimum wage fight might be losing steam.  After a Democratic mayor in Baltimore recently vetoed  $15/hour wage legislation and Iowa passed a law that rolls back minimum wage hikes (and sets a flat rate across the state), among other developments, the suggestion has been made that the money spent to support minimum wage hikes might not be translating into actual results.  Take for instance the Service Employees International Union ("SEIU") which has spent tens of millions of dollars on the "Fight for $15" movement:  Without a major victory to justify this spending, it has become unclear whether the SEIU (and other supporters of minimum wage hikes) will keep spending this type of money on the "Fight for $15" movement...


President Trump Continues to Make a Play For Union Workers & Leaders

Similar to President Ronald Reagan, President Trump continues to make major strides in the organized labor community by seeking to make inroads with the labor movement.  As Steven Greenhouse at The New York Times writes, although organized labor has seen a well documented decline in recent years, this demographic still has a great deal of political sway, something that Presidemt Trump appears to recognize.  By working to become the 'blue collar president', since his election, President Trump has made several well documented (and arguably successful) efforts to woo union workers and leaders into the Republican column.  This is certainly one of the more in depth and well researched articles that I have read on the topic as of late.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more