Skip to main content

Maryland's Paid Sick Leave Bill Heads to Governor's Desk


Last week, the Maryland General Assembly approved a bill that would require employers in the state with 15 or more full time employees to provide five days of paid sick leave to employees.  Businesses with less than 15 employees would be required to provide five unpaid sick and safe leave days.  Republican Governor Larry Hogan has dubbed the bill 'job killing' legislation and has stated he will veto it.  (As of this writing, the Governor has not taken any action on the bill).  

The Governor and some Republicans have argued that this bill will hurt small businesses and should not be so broad.  In fact, the Governor had pushed a competing proposal that would have changed the threshold and only required that employers with 50 or more employees to provide paid sick leave (rather than employers with 15 or more employees).  However, this plan would have provided tax incentives for smaller employers who offered paid sick leave to their employees.

Interesting to note that attempts to pass paid sick leave in Maryland have certainly been an uphill and protracted struggle that has stretched out over five years.  Prior paid sick leave legislation originally provided for seven days of paid sick leave (rather than the five days approved in this bill).  Those bills ultimately failed to gain the traction needed to become law.  However, with Democrats in control of the state legislature in Maryland, they were finally able to scrap together enough votes to approve this bill.  Of course, even if the Governor vetoes the bill (which is expected), Democrats have enough votes to override the veto.  However, given the legislature next convenes in January, that veto override could not happen until next year.  In essence, the Governor's veto of this bill will likely only stall the inevitable passage of this bill (assuming Democrats continue to vote in favor of the bill when the veto override vote next occurs).



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more