Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Quite the week for several developments on the labor & employment law front.  With that being said, the seminal moment might have been the confirmation of Alexander Acosta as the next Labor Secretary.  For those readers who followed the struggle the original nominee for the position had, Acosta's relatively smooth confirmation process was likely a welcomed bit of good news by the Trump administration as the President approaches the end of his first hundred days in office. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Senate Votes to Confirm Acosta as Next Labor Secretary

As I mentioned above, late yesterday afternoon, the Senate voted to confirm President Donald Trump's nominee for Labor Secretary.  As expected, the vote fell mainly along party lines.  However, with Republicans having the necessary votes (a majority) to confirm Acosta without needing any Democrats, this nomination and confirmation were never really in serious doubt.  Since the announcement of his nomination for Labor Secretary, Acosta had been widely praised and recognized as a relatively 'safe' choice for President Trump to have selected.  Now that he has been confirmed, it will be interesting to see how Acosta deals with minimum wage and overtime issues (and other Obama era regulations)...with those matters having become a focal point during his confirmation hearing after he declined to offer direct answers on several of these topics.


Minimum Wage Bills Moving Through Illinois Legislature

Currently, Illinois Democrats are pushing a few minimum wage bills through the State Legislature.  Notably, one of the bills seeks to raise the hourly minimum wage rate from its current rate of $8.25/hour all the way up to $15/hour over the next five years.  Although Republican Governor Bruce Rauner has indicated he would oppose the minimum wage bills currently in the Legislature, I think it is possible he would not veto a bill that had a modest minimum wage hike.  However, I think it is highly unlikely that a $15/hour minimum wage bill would become a reality in the state in the near future...but perhaps if a Democratic governor is elected next year, things could change.


Philip Miscimarra Named Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board

Late last week, President Donald Trump appointed Philip Miscimarra to chairman of the National Labor Relations Board.  This comes on the heels of President Trump having named Miscimarra as Acting Chairman back in January.  Miscimarra, nominated by President Barack Obama, was confirmed as a Board Member in July 2013.  With that being said, until President Trump nominates more Board Members (that can be confirmed by the Senate), I would not expect a substantial shift in Board rulings.  Keep an eye on this one though; it is quite likely that more employer friendly rulings will be issued by the NLRB once more Republicans are appointed to the Board.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per