Skip to main content

North Carolina Republicans Seek to Add Right to Work to State Constitution


North Carolina is a right to work state (and has been since 1947).  With that being said, Republicans in the state are seeking to add right to work to the Constitution via a voter referendum in November 2018.  In doing so, that would enshrine right to work in the state and make it much more difficult to overturn (compared to if right to work was not added to the North Carolina Constitution and a Democratic controlled Legislature could 'simply' pass a bill undoing right to work).

Last week, the House Judiciary I Committee passed a bill along party lines, by a 6 - 5 vote, to allow for the voter referendum.  The bill is now on its way to the House Rules Committee.  With Republicans pushing this bill along, and appearing to have the necessary votes to approve the bill, this is certainly on the fast track.  However, Democrats in the Legislature have argued adding right to work to the Constitution is uneccesary with Democratic Representative Duane Hall going so far as to say the proposed amendment to the Constitution 'changes nothing' (well besides making it more difficult to undo right to work in the state, right?)

At this point, it is certainly a good possibility that voters in the state will have a say on the matter next fall.  Should the referendum get that far, it will be interesting to see hard each side fights leading up to the vote (not to mention how much money is spent to support or oppose the referendum...)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...