Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Healthy and Safe Families and Workplaces Act (Rhode Island)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.

This is one to keep an eye on.


Between its proposed minimum wage bills and this paid sick leave bill, Rhode Island has certainly been in the news as of late.  Last week, Rhode Island's Senate Labor Committee held a hearing on a proposed paid sick leave bill which would allow employees in the state to earn up to 56 hours (seven days) of paid sick leave and safe leave to care for themselves and their families (and to address domestic violence).  

This bill, the Healthy and Safe Families and Workplaces Act, certainly appears to have momentum on its side with a majority of Democrats (89.5%) and Republicans (68.8%) in the state supporting paid sick leave.  In fact, Governor Gina Raimondo had stated earlier this year that paid sick leave was a top priority.  Whether that support will translate into the passage of this bill is no sure thing, however.  It would not surprise me to see further debate and negotiation continue in regard to the language of the bill (and possibly how many days of paid sick leave would be offered).  Readers might recall that Maryland recently went through a struggle to pass a paid sick leave bill in the state (with a prior paid sick leave bill in the state providing for seven days of paid sick leave...rather than the five that were eventually provided for in the approved bill).  Even through that hard fought battle, it still appears likely that the Governor will veto the bill (although there are enough votes to override the veto).

For the time being, supporters of paid sick leave have reason to be optimistic that paid sick leave will become a reality in the state.  However, until this bill actually passes and is signed into law, this is still no "sure thing".


For additional information:  http://www.rifuture.org/earned-sick-days-popular/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more