Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Right to Work Edition


There have been quite a few developments in regard to right to work around the country over the past few weeks.  Whether it has been a further development in West Virginia, a proposed bill to turn Pennsylvania into the next right to work state, an attempt to block right to work in Missouri, or positive news out of Michigan about the impact of right to work in the state, there has been no shortage of news to follow.  I think it is a good time to take a break and look at what is going on with right to work issues around the country with an article dedicated to the topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


West Virginia Senate Votes to Override Governor's Veto

Readers might recall that West Virginia moved rather quickly to pass right to work legislation in the state which has since come under fire (with an injunction having been granted to halt implementation of the law for the time being).  The West Virginia Legislature subsequently passed SB 330 which aimed to clean up the previously approved right to work bill (by removing provisions that would seem to exempt building and construction trade unions), however, Governor Jim Justice vetoed the bill last Wednesday on the grounds that the matter should play out in the court system first.  Afterward, the West Virginia Senate voted 21 - 12 to override the veto (West Virginia only requires a simple majority to overcome the Governor's veto.)  At this point, it would take a similar vote in the West Virginia House of Delegates for SB 330 to become law without the Governor's signature.  It goes without saying that with this veto (and the pending litigation), there are certainly a lot of moving pieces in regard to right to work in the state of West Virginia...


Could Pennsylvania Be the Next Right to Work State?

Matt Bernardini at The Public Opinion wrote a recent note about attempts in Pennsylvania to turn the state into the next right to work state in the near future.  A set of bills, called the "Open Workforce Initiative", would seek to eliminate mandatory dues to unions for state employees.  Supporters of the bill have argued that the bill will increase economic growth (see the article below in regard to Michigan's economic growth for further review) and stands a realistic chance of becoming law, in part because of the steady decline of unions over the past few decades.  This one has a ways to go before becoming law...but it certainly stands a fair shot of becoming law.


Right to Work Appears to Have Positive Impact in Michigan

Interesting note the uptick in per capita personal income growth for workers in Michigan.  According to the article from Michigan Capitol Confidential, the growth has been faster than 40 other states in the past year.  The article suggests this steady growth can be attributed to Michigan's right to work law which has been in effect for nearly 5 years now.  Perhaps the right to work law is not the only thing that has propelled personal income growth...but it certainly has not stymied it.


Attempt to Repeal Missouri's Right to Work Bill Proceeds

Recently, Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft signed off on the wording of a petition that would put Missouri's right to work law in front of voters.  Under Missouri law, to get a referendum on the ballot in regard to the right to work law, signatures totaling 5% of voters from two thirds of the state's congressional districts must be collected on the petition by August 28, 2017.  While supporters of the petition (such as the secretary-treasurer for the Missouri AFL-CIO) has indicated there is plenty of time to get the necessary signatures, it will be interesting to see if it can be done in time (and how many of those signatures are contested).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more