Skip to main content

Iowa Rolls Back Minimum Wage Hikes


Let us call this a rather intriguing, if not potentially litigation likely, development out of Iowa.  Recently, the Iowa Senate gave final approval to House File 295 which would roll back minimum wage increases for many in the state.  Yes, roll back wages that have already gone into place.

Under the bill, which was approved by a 29 - 21 vote in the Senate, local governments would be prohibited from raising hourly minimum wage rates above the state level.    Currently, the minimum wage rate in the state is set at $7.25/hour (which has not gone up in nearly a decade).  However, several counties in the state have approved higher minimum wage rates ranging from $10.10/hour to $10.75/hour.  In fact, one county approved a minimum wage hike to $8.20/hour the day after the Iowa Senate approved this measure.

For those wondering, the bill had already passed the Iowa House.  With the Iowa Senate voting along party lines (with Republicans supporting the bill and all Democrats and one Independent opposing it), the bill was subsequently sent to the Governor's desk for signature.  Last Thursday, Republican Governor Terry Branstad signed the bill into law, over the objection of Democrats and hourly workers.

The question then becomes, what happens to the counties that already raised their minimum wage rates?  In short, hourly workers in these counties would see their wages rolled back to the statewide rate of $7.25/hour, although some groups are petitioning employers to keep the wage rates where they are currently set.

In fact, this past weekend I was talking about this development with a regular reader of the blog.  She brought up a good point about now that the bill has become law, employers and HR professionals in the state will likely have quite a headache having to reconcile employee pay, handbooks, IRS filings, etc. to conform with the new statewide hourly wage rate.  Republicans in Iowa had argued, prior to the bill's passage, that the bill was necessary to keep wage rates uniform in the state and avoid a patchwork of rules (with different counties having higher hourly wage rates) that could hinder business.  While having to navigate this patchwork of rules likely will not be an issue in the longterm, it seems likely that there will be a bit of a learning curve for employers to roll back wages and comply with the bill.  With that being said, I do not think Democrats or hourly workers impacted by this bill will go quietly.  It certainly would not surprise me to see a lawsuit filed over the implementation of this law.  Stay tuned.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more