Skip to main content

Baltimore's Mayor Vetoes $15/Hour Minimum Wage Bill


Last Friday, in a somewhat surprising move, the Mayor of Baltimore vetoed a bill which would have raised the minimum wage rate in the city to $15/hour.  Currently, the minimum wage in the state of Maryland is $8.75/hour with a mandated hike to $9.25/hour coming in July and another hike to $10.10/hour coming next year. Under this proposed measure, employers with 50 or more employees in Baltimore would have been required to raise wages to $15/hour by 2022; employers with fewer than 50 employees would have been required to meet that pay threshold by 2026.

The Mayor, Catherine Pugh, noted that she vetoed the bill in part because of concern that a $15/hour wage rate in the city would disadvantage businesses and hourly workers.  Given that surrounding cities and states would have lower wage rates (in comparison to the proposed $15/hour wage rate), the Mayor expressed concern that employers in Baltimore would leave and take jobs elsewhere.  It is interesting to note, however, that Mayor Pugh is a Democrat yet she still vetoed this bill.  Given that Democrats have traditionally been the party that advocates for higher wage rates, Mayor Pugh's opposition to the bill is somewhat of an eye brow raising situation.

The bill, which had been approved by an 11 - 3 vote by the Baltimore City Council, now faces an uncertain future.  To overcome the Mayor's veto, 12 votes in favor of the bill would be required.  However, at this time, it does not appear that 12 City Council members would actually vote in favor of the bill (and take the somewhat unprecedented step of overriding the veto).  I will still say to stay tuned..but for those hoping for a minimum wage hike in Baltimore (beyond what is mandated statewide), I do not think this bill has much of a likelihood of becoming a reality at this point.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more