Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Excuse the brevity of this post, but I am in a coffee shop in Dallas before Court this morning and the wifi is a bit spotty.  With that being said, I read some great articles this week and had a tough time narrowing down which ones I wanted to highlight.  But as we await the confirmation hearings for President Trump's nominee for Labor Secretary, I want to highlight one of the better written articles on that topic that I came across this week.

As always, below sea a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Acosta Continues to Gain Support From Labor Unions

The New York Daily News recently published an update on Alexander Acosta, President Trump's nominee for Labor Secretary.  The article notes that Acosta has recently received the support of the International Association of Fire Fighters (which follows the recent support from the Laborers' International Union of North America), something that the prior Labor Secretary nominee, Andy Puzder, failed to garner.  Of course just because a union endorses (or does not endorse) a nominee, that might not tip the balance.  But with at least some union support so far, President Trump surely must feel more confident in his nominee's chances of confirmation.


A Closer Look at the National Right to Work Bill Pending in Congress

Readers might recall that a few weeks ago, I pointed out a national right to work bill that had been presented in Congress.  While no sure thing (as prior national right to work bills have failed), with a Republican controlled Congress and a Republican President, there has been some thought that this bill could stand a shot...no matter how far off a national right to work bill might still be.  Tyrone Richardson wrote an article the other week with a bit more analysis of the bill and what to possibly expect going forward.  Well worth a read.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per