Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Cornell Union Election Edition


It has been a few months since I have seen a union election get a significant deal of attention.  However, with the recent graduate student voting having occurred this past Monday and Tuesday at Cornell and the subsequent "too close to call" announcement, I thought it would be appropriate to highlight this topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Perhaps one of the least surprising developments occurred before the union election even occurred:  the Cornell Graduate Students United ("CGSU") and Cornell administration filed grievances in regard to disputed activities ahead of Monday's vote.  As Josh Girsky over at The Cornell Daily Sun writes, CGSU filed a grievance in regard to statements by Senior Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Barbara Knuth which suggested fewer graduate students would be hired if unionization were to occur.  The Cornell administration, on the other hand, filed a grievance and alleged that CGSU and its affiliates were coercing voters.  Interesting to see how these grievances play out...especially depending upon the outcome of the election.



Anna Delwiche and Josh Girsky wrote a great article earlier this week with a report that the results of the election remained too close to call, with 81 ballots hanging in the balance.  At the time of their article, 856 votes were cast in favor of unionization while 919 votes were cast against.  The issue centers around 81 ballots that remained in dispute:  65 ballots were challenged and would be discussed later, 6 absentee ballots were not yet opened, with an additional 10 unresolved challenged ballots.  Although the article covers the results well, I did want to highlight this article in particular because of the well established time line of how this union election came about.  Well worth the read.


Dean Barbara Knuth Releases Statement Calling Election "Inconclusive"

On Wednesday, Dean Barbara Knuth (yes, the same Dean mentioned in the above note) released a statement in which she called the election results "inconclusive" and that after a review in the next month, the final outcome will be made on the results of the election.  I would say this response coincides with the "too close to call" that was referenced above...there are still approximately 81 ballots that remain in dispute.  Per Dean Knuth's note, I would expect this to get sorted out in the coming weeks.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more