Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it.  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate.

For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Suspicionless Drug Testing Permissible in Some Cases Without Violating the 4th Amendment

Late last month, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Friedenberg v. School Board of Palm Beach County, in which the Court held that suspicionless drug testing is lawful in some instances, without running afoul of the Fourth Amendment.  In Friedenberg, the school board required all applicants for substitute teacher positions to pass a drug test.  The teachers argued this was a violation of the Fourth Amendment as a suspicionless and unconscionable drug test.  However, as a matter of first impression, the Court held that teachers have a diminished privacy interest (in a school setting), the urine drug test was minimally invasive, and that the school established it had a compelling interest in protecting its students by ensuring the teachers were not impaired.  This opinion is well worth a read for those looking for an in depth analysis of how at least one court treats the lawfulness of drug testing, especially drug testing as far reaching as what occurred in this case.


D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Browning-Ferris Joint Employer Standard

At the end of December, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a (much anticipated) opinion in which it in essence affirmed the Browning-Ferris joint employer standard.  In its opinion, the Court held that "the right-to-control element of the Board's joint-employer standard has deep roots in the common law.  The common law also permits consideration of those forms of indirect control that play a relevant part in determining the essential terms and conditions of employment...[T]he joint-employer test [includes] consideration of both an employer's reserved right to control and its indirect control over employees' terms and conditions of employment."  As many have noted, it will be interesting to see what the National Labor Relations Board does, in regard to its rulemaking, in light of the D.C. Circuit's opinion.  Stay tuned.


A Few Tips On How To Handle Your Next Department of Labor Wage & Hour Audit

Jim Reidy at HR Daily Advisor recently wrote an article that provides employers with a few suggestions on how to handle their next Department of Labor wage & hour audit.  As with many of these types of articles, each suggestion might not be applicable to every employer.  Nevertheless, the range of suggestions provided here include advice that employers cooperate within a reasonable period of time, offer assistance to the inspector (without going overboard), and not blocking the inspector access to the employees, among other tips.  The article ends with a recognition of the Department of Labor's PAID program and the somewhat mixed reviews it has received since being implemented earlier last year.


Taking a Closer Look at the CBS Decision to Deny Les Moonves His $120 Million Severance

Some readers have likely read about Les Moonves, the former CBS CEO, and his resignation from the company last September.  That resignation resulted in a severance agreement being entered into for $120 million.  After news of that severance leaked, an uproar began as the reason for his resignation seemed to center around a groundswell of #MeToo complaints made against him.  Well, late last year, it was announced that CBS would not pay Moonves his $120 million dollar settlement.  Eric B. Meyer took a look Moonves' employment and settlement agreements in an effort to establish how CBS could backtrack and withhold the $120 million settlement...after agreeing to pay it.  This one is well worth a read, in part for Meyer's highlighting of the relevant portions of each agreement to delineate the important parts for readers.


7 Suggestions For Ensuring ADA Compliance

The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") is a hot button issue for many in human resources and can often lead to hand ringing and ongoing frustration over ensuring the employer remains compliant.  Lisa Burden at HR Dive wrote an article on Monday that offers employers 7 tips to better ensure ADA compliance is less of a concern.  As with the article on handling a Department of Labor wage & hour audit, every suggestion here might not apply to every employer.  With that being said, there are enough key pointers here for employers that I would strongly suggest reviewing this one at least once or twice.


McDonald's Workers Strike Over Workplace Safety

This past Tuesday, workers in St. Petersburg, Tampa, and Orlando went on strike to bring awareness to workplace safety matters and request their employers implement workplace violence training.  This comes on the heels of a McDonald's worker being attached at the end of last year by a customer over an apparent lack of straws at the counter.  (Some readers might have seen the video of the attack).  For the sake of these workers, especially those in the fast food industry that work with often hostile customers at all hours of the day, I hope this strike will bring about change in their workplaces.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per