Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Minimum Wage Edition


Readers might have seen that the 116th United States Congress was sworn in yesterday.  While we could spend all morning talking about the upcoming legislative agenda or what Nancy Pelosi will do now that she has become Speaker of the House again, perhaps that discussion is better served by watching C-SPAN.  On the topic of developments to start the year, there have been a range of hourly minimum wage increases across the country.  Given these hourly minimum wage hikes, I think it is appropriate to take a look at the impact these minimum wage hikes have had as well as consider whether other minimum wage hikes could be on the horizon.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at Hourly Minimum Wage Hikes in 2019

US News & World Report published an article recently that noted that hourly workers in 20 states and 24 cities and counties across the country will see a minimum wage increase this year.  The article does a good job differentiating between the minimum wage increases approved by state legislatures compared to those approved by voters at the polls.  For those looking for a concise overview of how these minimum wage hikes came about, this article is worth a read.


California Employers Grapple With How to Manage Minimum Wage Increase

With an hourly minimum wage rate of $12 in California, some employers in the state are struggling to find ways to offset the rising labor costs.  As NBC San Diego reports, some employers in the state are considering raising prices (again), introducing automation, adding a surcharge, or finding ways to increase operational efficiency (such as some restaurants eliminating wait staff and instead switching to counter service).  However, with the hourly minimum wage rate set to increase again over the next three years, there appears to be little in the way of a respite for employers in the state.  While this article does not provide a clear cut “solution” for employers in the state as to how to manage the rising labor costs, it does shine a light on the struggles that some employers are now facing.



Given that Pennsylvania’s hourly wage rate has been tied to the Federal hourly wage rate ($7.25/hour) for nearly a decade and the fact that so many other states have raised their hourly wage rates lately has left hourly workers in the state clamoring for a wage hike.  Readers might recall that during Governor Tom Wolf’s last campaign, he advocated for a $12/hour wage rate.  While there has been little progress so far, many Democrats in the state believe that this could be the year that a minimum wage increase takes hold.  The first thing to keep an eye on?  Governor Wolf could roll out a minimum wage hike as part of his annual budget address next month.  Stay tuned.



Recently elected Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers has given strong signals that he intends to take steps to increase the state’s hourly minimum wage rate.  Similar to Pennsylvania, hourly workers in Wisconsin currently make $7.25/hour.  The Wisconsin State Journal reports that Evers has stated “there will be a clear pathway found in the budget to get to” an increase.  (This is in reference to the Governor’s budget which will be released next month.  The governor’s budget traditionally sets the tone in the state and kick starts the debate in the state’s next two year spending plan.).  For those hoping for a minimum wage increase, these comments are a welcome change from former Governor Scott Walker, who did not make an hourly minimum wage increase a priority during his terms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per