Skip to main content

Employee Gets Jury Duty Summons...Now What?


Chances are, most readers have received a jury duty summons at some point in their lives.  Oftentimes it seems the jury duty summons occurs at the least opportune time:  with a pending deadline at work, childcare responsibilities, a trip planned, etc.  While some states allow a jury duty summons to be re-set (or excused in its entirety), sometimes it simply cannot be done and the employee will have to take time off work.  Unfortunately, some employers do not take kindly to the employee missing work for jury duty, with some employers even punishing or terminating the employee for missing work.  Employers, in a word:  Do not do this.  Instead, there are more appropriate/lawful ways to manage an employee’s jury duty summons without running afoul of the law.

While this reference is not the definitive guide to the topic and not intended to serve as legal advice (those experiencing a similar situation should consult their HR representative and/or employment law attorney for guidance), it provides a framework that can be referred to when needed.


As always, at the outset, I advise readers to consult the law in their state in regard to jury duty, as the law varies from state to state.  For the sake of this post, I will use Texas as an example.  Under Chapter 122 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (“CPRC”), a permanent employee is protected when attending jury duty. The employee must notify their employer of the leave and give notice that the employee intends to return to work after completing the jury duty as soon as practical.  For those employers that penalize or terminate an employee for attending jury duty, the employee is entitled to not less than one year’s salary nor more than five year’s salary along with attorney’s fees.  (Friendly reminder Texas employees:  Texas law requires that a cause of action in regard to Chapter 122 of the CPRC be filed no later than the second anniversary of the date in which jury duty commenced).

Readers might be wondering what would constitute  ‘penalizing’ an employee.  This could include giving the employee additional work assignments, failing to promote the employee, withholding a bonus, docking pay, not allowing the employee to use previously scheduled time off, etc.  Quite simply, any employment action that could reasonably be viewed as negative or that would place the employee in a diminished work capacity could be viewed as unlawful and therefore expose the employer to liability under the CPRC or related statute/caselaw in another state.

Employee Handbook

To avoid this situation, I would suggest employers implement a written policy (preferably in a handbook that has been distributed to employees), that spells out how the employer handles an employee’s jury duty summons.  This policy could provide whom must be notified of the jury duty, request a copy of the summons itself (which indicates the time, place, and date), and other pertinent information related to the employee missing work to attend jury duty.

Employee Pay

Of course, many are now wondering whether employees have to be paid for attending jury duty.  As the old lawyer adage goes:  It depends.

  • Salaried exempt employees:  If the employee works any part of a 5 day week and misses a portion to attend jury duty, he/she must receive "regular wages" for the week.  "Regular wages" mean the standard salary for the week but does not include performance bonuses or other related incentives.  If the employee misses an entire week, he/she is due no pay for that week.
  • Salaried and hourly non-exempt employees:  Employers are not required to pay the wages for these employees while they attend jury duty.
  • Temporary/Seasonal employees:  These employees are not entitled to pay for attending jury duty.  Perhaps even more troubling, these employees are not protected by the above mentioned laws (the CPRC)
However, a breath of fresh air for employers would come in handy here, right?  Good news then.  Texas law allows employers to have employees that attend jury duty use their paid vacation or other paid time off as long as it is not contrary to existing company policies or labor agreements.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per