Skip to main content

Florida Attorney Moves to Put $15/Hour Minimum Wage Measure on the Ballot


This past Tuesday morning, Florida attorney John Morgan announced plans to take steps to put a minimum wage hike ballot measure before voters in 2020.  The ballot measure would seek to raise the hourly minimum wage rate in the state from its current rate of $8.46/hour up to $15/hour.  (The hourly wage rate would go up to $10/hour on September 30, 2021 and then rise $1/year until it hit $15/hour in September of 2026).  Notably, the proposal would place this minimum wage hike in the Florida Constitution as an amendment.  Within the past year or so, Morgan's law firm has raised nearly $500,000 for a committee that has been pushing for a minimum wage hike.

Readers might wonder why a Florida attorney (that is not the Attorney General of the state nor a politician) would put such time and effort toward a ballot measure.  That is a good question.  It is worth nothing that in 2016, Morgan helped a ballot measure succeed that legalized marijuana in the state.  Building off that success, he has now apparently turned his focus to minimum wage arguing that minimum wage workers should be entitled to a "living wage".  While succeeding in the efforts to legalize marijuana a few years ago does not mean the $15/hour ballot measure would succeed, if voters get a say, it does lend credence to the fact that Morgan appears ready and willing to fight for its success.  After all, late last year he indicated he was ready to pledge $1 million to support a $15/hour minimum wage movement in the state.

It will be interesting to see whether this effort gains any steam in the coming months.  Stay tuned.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more