Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Raise the Wage Act of 2019 (US Congress)


As with many employment and labor related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Readers will recall that during last November’s elections, Democrats took back control of the House of Representatives.   As a result, many expected that once the new legislative session began earlier this month, House Democrats would seek to advance their agenda by introducing bills catered to their base.  It did not take long for that to happen.  Late last week, House Democrats introduced a bill, the Raise the Wage Act of 2019, that seeks to gradually raise the federal hourly minimum wage rate from $7.25/hour up to $15/hour.  While Democrats appear to have the votes to advance the bill to the Senate, that is where many expect it will meet the buzzsaw as Republicans still retain majority control of the Senate.  As readers are likely aware, a majority of Republicans (including in the Senate) have shown little interest in increasing the federal hourly minimum wage rate.  Without Senate Republicans supporting the measure, it is highly likely the Raise the Wage Act of 2019 would die in the Senate.

With that being said, there might be a reason for Democrats and minimum wage advocates to be optimistic.  For one, a companion minimum wage bill is making its way through the Senate. At this point, that bill appears to have support somewhere in the 30’s; still short of the requisite number of votes, but it is a step in the right direction.  As well, President Donald Trump had previously campaigned on a position of raising the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $10/hour.  If President Trump began urging Senate Republicans to support a federal hourly minimum wage hike, it is possible there could be a compromise reached.  While $15/hour might not be a realistic goal if Republicans were to jump on board, perhaps $10 or $11 per hour would be a possibility.

With that being said, for the time being, the Raise the Wage Act of 2019 is likely nothing more than a talking point for Democrats and their supporters for the time being.  With Senate Republicans and pro business groups likely to mobilize in force against this bill, should it advance to the Senate, the Raise the Wage Act of 2019 appears to not have legs if it advances out of the House.  

At the very least, however, Democrats continue to keep a minimum wage hike at the forefront and part of the national discussion.  With many states approving minimum wage hikes to statewide minimum wages last year (including in somewhat conservative states such as Arkansas and Arizona), perhaps we are not necessarily too far away from an eventual federal minimum wage hike?  While it likely will not happen this year, perhaps within the next few.  Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/16/house-democrats-introduce-bill-to-hike-minimum-wage-to-15-per-hour.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more