Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


With the update on the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira case, I point readers to that update given the Court's unanimous decision finding that an arbitration provision was not enforceable.  For those that already checked out that article and are looking for something new, I came across a few articles this week worth highlighting.  In particular, I call attention to a new wrestling promotion that is making equal pay one of the tent poles of its new organization.  It will be interesting to see how that plays out.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


New Wrestling Promotion Announces Equal Pay For Male & Female Wrestlers

Some readers might enjoy watching wrestling, whether it be WWE, ROH, NJPW, or another indie promotion.  Of course, let us not forget UFC or Bellator for those looking for something a bit more physical.  Last week, it was announced that a new wrestling promotion was being created called All Elite Wrestling ("AEW").  At the AEW announcement in Jacksonville, it was noted that the promotion intended to implement equal pay for entry level wrestlers.  As Brandi Rhodes, one of the participants in the AEW announcement later clarified, while all male and female wrestlers would not be paid the same, AEW intended to do away with the gender pay gap for its wrestlers.  This is noteworthy in so much that with equal pay being a major talking point over the past few years, the newest high profile wrestling promotion made sure to make note of it in its introductory press conference/announcement.  It will be interesting to see if other, more established promotions follow suit.



Earlier this week, Jennifer Carsen at HrDive addressed a situation many employers might have faced:  what to do when they decide to discipline an employee that has recently engaged in protected activity.  I will clarify here, we are not talking about an employer disciplining an employee for engaging in protected activity (which in and of itself is illegal).  Rather, an employer that decides to discipline an employee for a reason unrelated to the employee engaging in protected activity.  Walking through how employers can address this situation with several prominent employment law attorneys, Carsen provides several suggestions for employers such as making sure you have documented the problem previously and building your case for disciplining the employee with sufficient support, among other ideas.  Well worth a read.



Many employers often have offices, worksites, warehouses, etc. in multiple states.  While that does not necessarily present a problem, issues can arise when an employer tries to implement uniform paid sick and safe time policies that can often run afoul of the laws in different states.  As the article notes, there are a wide range of statewide and local laws in place across the country in regard to paid sick and safe time that an employee is entitled to.  Employers, while it may be easier to create a uniform policy for your employees, make note of the pitfalls that could pop up here and expose you to liability.


Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand Announces Presidential Candidacy: What to Expect

For those readers looking for a broad overview of the platforms of the candidates that have recently announced their intention to run for President in 2020, I refer you to Reuters, Politico, The Washington Post, The New York Times, etc.  For the sake of this post, I wanted to instead touch on some of the employment, labor, and HR related positions of some of the candidates.  Earlier his week, Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand from New York announced that she would run for President in 2020.  Noteably, she is a supporter of a $15/hour minimum wage rate, universal paid family leave, and taking further steps to combat sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace.  While her candidacy is still young and her entire platform has not been specifically set out, at a minimum, her position on the hot button employment, labor, and HR related matters should strike a cord with the Democratic base.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...