Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: HB 222 (Texas)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Following a lawsuit filed earlier this year on the matter, on Monday, Texas Republican Representative Matt Krause introduced HB 222 in the Texas House of Representatives.  That bill would prohibit cities in the state from passing ordinances, such as the paid sick leave ordinance approved by the Austin City Council earlier this year.  If readers recall, Austin approved a paid sick leave ordinance that required private employers in the city with more than 15 workers to provide at most 8 days of paid sick leave per year for its full time employees.  For private employers in the city with less than 15 employees, the ordinance required that these employers provide at most 6 days of paid sick leave per year.  San Antonio followed suit this past summer with a similar law while Dallas has reportedly been going back and forth on the idea.

For those keeping track at home, many progressives hailed Austin’s paid leave ordinance as a gigantic step forward, especially given the state’s reluctance to approve a statewide paid sick leave measure.  (Austin is a traditionally Democratic city in a ‘red’ state).  In a solidly (well maybe not as solid after the 2018 Senate race between Democrat Beto O’Rourke and Republican Ted Cruz) Republican controlled state, some in the Texas Legislature made it no secret that they would seek to introduce legislation to overturn Austin’s ordinance.  One of those Representatives, Paul Workman from Austin, was defeated in last week’s midterm elections.  Critics of Republican efforts to overturn the ordinance pointed to Workman’s defeat as evidence that voters had no appetite for the Texas Legislature jumping into the fray.  Nevertheless, Representative Krause appears ready and willing to pick up the slack with his introduction of HB 222.

With a state Legislature controlled by Republicans, I would expect that HB 222 will find the votes to pass.  The question then turns to what paid sick leave advocates will do next.  With no realistic avenue to getting a referendum on the ballot or finding the votes in the Texas Legislature to support a statewide measure, perhaps the next/only option is to turn attention to having the U.S. Congress approve a nationwide paid sick leave bill.  There appears to be some interest among Republicans for passing a paid family leave bill...perhaps additional support can also be garnered for a paid sick leave bill?  With an incoming Congress in January comprised of a Democratic House and a Republican Senate, maybe a bipartisan bill can find enough votes to pass.

Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://www.statesman.com/news/20181112/bill-filed-monday-would-scrap-austins-paid-sick-leave-ordinance

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more