Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: HR Edition


This past weekend, I was talking with an esteemed worker in the HR field and noted that this week, I would focus this post on HR related topics.  In doing so, I came across a few HR related articles worth highlighting.  Of note, I call attention to the first article that touches on the use of non-disclosure agreements for sexual harassment matters (in the workplace).  To the loyal HR readers of the blog, this particular article is worth a read, given the increased attention that sexual assault in the workplace has received.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


An Emerging Trend: Non-Disclosure Agreements For Sexual Harassment Matters

By now, readers are likely familiar with the #MeToo movement which has brought attention to sexual harassment matters in the workplace.  Kate Palmer over at The HR Director wrote an article which points out a troubling trend that she has found:  rather than non-disclosure agreements being used to protect a company’s trade secrets, there instead often being used to silence sexual harassment victims in the workplace.  Kate points out that while non-disclosure agreements cannot be used to prevent an employee from making a protected disclosure nor be used to prohibit disclosure of acts of sexual harassment which are in breach of the Equality Act 2010 (for those that work in the United Kingdom), many employees are not aware of this and therefore sign non-disclosure agreements.  Couple this with the fact that many employees also feel ‘compelled’ to sign the non-disclosures or risk being terminated, Kate suggested that non-disclosure agreements are therefore having the unintended impact of improperly silencing victims of sexual assault in the workplace.


The Importance of a (Good) Employee Handbook

Tigerhr published a well thought out article in regard to the importance of employers creating or maintaining an employee handbook.  Not only does this article provide a few suggestions for what an employee handbook should include (such as information on how the employer handles sick leave, performance expectations, and discipline procedures), but advice is given on how employers can better format their handbooks and help shape the company’s culture.  As always, not every piece of advice will apply to everyone in the HR field.  However, some insightful ideas are provided to make this article worth a read.



A few weeks ago, readers might recall that a large scale walkout occurred by many Google employees in an effort, in part, to draw attention to their belief that the company improperly handled sexual assault allegations that were made against several of the company’s executives.  In addition, last week the company announced it was ending its mandatory arbitration requirement of sexual misconduct claims, in response to the walkoutHR Dive published a follow up article that took a look at five demands made by the Google employees that they want the company to address.  Employers take note, this article provides an analysis of how each of these five demands can be used as a lesson (or guide) on how to strengthen your own HR department and policies.  While each demand and subsequent analysis might not apply to all, this article is worth a quick review.


Handling Religious Accomodations: A Few Tips

The HR Daily Advisor recently addressed a topic that many in the HR field are confronted with:  How to properly address a religious accommodation request by an employee.  In this article, five helpful pointers are provided to help employers navigate the process.  As the article suggests, no two accommodation requests are identical.  Rather, employers are advised to treat each request individually and maintain an open dialogue with the employee that requests the accommodation.  Whether any of these five suggestions apply to your HR office is difficult to say.  Nevertheless, one (or more) of the tips could prove beneficial the next time your employee makes a religious accommodation request.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per