Skip to main content

Department of Labor Rescinds The 80/20 Rule For Tip Guidance


Last week, the Department of Labor issued an opinion letter in which it rescinded guidance that said tipped workers that are paid less than minimum wage must spend most of their time performing tipped-wage duties.  That guidance, implemented during the President Barack Obama era Department of Labor (often referred to as the 80/20 rule) required that the tipped workers spend 80% of their time performing tipped-wage duties such as waiting tables rather than folding napkins or cleaning dishes.

In its letter, the Department of Labor noted that it intended to clarify the Field Operations Handbook section 30d00(e), which previously had resulted in some confusion and inconsistent application.  With the issuance of its opinion letter, the Department of Labor stated that the letter was intended to clarify FOH section 30d00(e) in a manner that not only ensured consistent application of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") but also gave employers a level of clarity to determine whether their actions were in compliance with the FLSA and provided workers full protection under the FLSA as well.

In its letter, the Department of Labor said it did not "intend to place a limitation on the amount of duties related to a tip-producing occupation that may be performed, so long as they are performed contemporaneously with customer service duties."  In doing so, twenty five "acceptable" tasks were identified for tipped workers to perform.

This opinion letter comes on the heels of a July 2018 lawsuit filed by the National Restaurant Association that argued the guidance previously in place placed a burden on restaurant owners.  The lawsuit argued the 80/20 rule was "an arbitrary number to deal with."  As well, it was argued that when the President Obama era Department of Labor added the 80/20 rule, it did so "quietly" and  without notice to the public or an opportunity to respond.  However, workers and their advocates argued that getting ride of the 80/20 rule would allow businesses to take advantage of workers by paying them a sub-minimum wage even if they were not receiving frequent tips.

As of this writing, the National Restaurant Association is apparently still moving forward with its lawsuit.


For a copy of the Department of Labor's opinion letter:  https://www.dol.gov/whd/opinion/FLSA/2018/2018_11_08_27_FLSA.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more