Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


As many readers have likely experienced, some workplaces are permeated with overtime abuse by hourly workers.  Whether this overtime abuse is intentional or not, it can lead to employers incurring unexpected (and avoidable) labor costs and other employees feeling a sense of resentment toward those co-workers that are ‘milking’ the system.  All of the below articles are worth a read, but I call particular attention to the EmpLAWyerologist article on the topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Following the 2018 Election, What Can Employees & Employees Expect From the New Congress

On Tuesday, pro-business and pro-employer stalwarts, Bruce Rauner (Republican Governor of Illinois) and Scott Walker (Republican Governor of Wisconsin), were voted out of office after their reelection bids were sidelined by their Democratic challengers.  While the employment and labor law future for employers in those states look bleak, Fisher Phillips published an article with an eye on how the U.S. Congress is likely to handle employment and labor law related legislation now that Democrats took control of the House while Republicans held onto the Senate.  The entire article is worth a read, but long story short, things are likely to grind to a halt in Congress while there is likely to be more progress at the statewide and local levels.


Predictive Scheduling: Not Quite a National Phenomenon...Yet

A few years ago, I highlighted predictive scheduling ordinances that had started to pop up around the country.  In short, these ordinances are aimed at mandating predictive schedules for workers a few weeks in advance and imposing penalties if employers change the schedules.  HR Dive has a well researched article that reviews the current predictive scheduling laws in place around the country.  Of note, each city or state that has enacted a predictive scheduling ordinance has a link to the actual ordinance itself for readers to review further, if interested.


Employee Overtime Abuse...What Can An Employer Do?

Unfortunately, something that many employers often see is overtime abuse by their employees.  The EmpLAWyerologist took a close look at the matter and suggested a few things that employers can do to help curb overtime abuse.  While several suggestions are provided, I think one of the paramount ideas is that employers actually implement and (evenly) enforce an overtime policy.  Picking and choosing when and to whom to apply an overtime policy to can lead to avoidable issues down the road.  Employers, be smart.


Should Non-Smoking Workers Get Extra Vacation Days? Perhaps

USA Today reported earlier this year that approximately 42% of non-smoking workers believe they should receive between 3-5 extra vacation days a year.  Before you call this idea outlandish, consider the strain on employers that have employees that take smoke breaks.  A study found that the average smoker wastes 6 days each year taking smoke breaks at work.  Six days...that is no small potatoes.  In fact, one company in Japan has implemented a policy to give 6 extra vacation days a year to its non-smoking employees.  While that idea might not catch on stateside, it does show that at least one employer has found a way to ‘reward’ non-smoking employees that are not continually consuming work time to step outside for a smoke break.


The Ongoing Conflict Over Employee Protections For Marijuana Use:  State Laws v. Federal Law

Readers will recall that over the past several years, there have been a wide range of developments across the country in regard to an employee's use of marijuana and whether an employer could discipline (or even terminate) an employee for their off the clock usage.  In perhaps one of the more well known cases, Coats v. Dish Network, the Colorado Supreme Court in 2015 found that while the state lawfully allowed marijuana usage, the fact that federal law barred it meant that the employee could be lawfully terminated for his off the clock usage.  On the other hand in Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics, the Rhode Island Superior Court held last year that an employer unlawfully discriminated against hiring an applicant for an internship position once it became known she was a medical marijuana cardholder.  A recent article from The National Law Review shines a further light on the unsettled nature of the matter and how courts across the country are issuing conflicting rulings as to an employee's off the clock marijuana usage.  Employees, take note.  Depending the state you work in, an employer *might* be able to lawfully terminate you for your off the clock marijuana usage...even if off the clock marijuana usage is lawful under your state's laws.


Massachusetts & Its New Non-Compete Law

Perhaps this should have been The National Law Review edition this week?  Some readers might have heard that Massachusetts has a new non-compete law that has been in place for about a month now.  As noted, The National Law Review took a look at four different portions of the new law and how things are playing out so far.  Even for those readers not in Massachusetts, this is a good article that parses some of the more nuanced portions of non-competes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per