Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


While I could have lead this post off with a nod to the news earlier this week that the National Labor Relations Board has extended the comment period for its proposed rulemaking to determine joint employer status (thanks for the write up, HR Dive), there is not a lot to say beyond the comment period has been extended into December.  As a result, I wanted to instead focus on next Tuesday and the employment law related referendums and propositions facing voters across the country.  In particular, Measure L, which is on the ballot in Anaheim this Election Day, is worth a review.  (Do not forget to also check out Proposition B, a minimum wage ballot measure facing voters in Missouri on Tuesday).

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



The Los Angeles Times published an article earlier this month that focused attention on the millions of dollars being spent by Disney and labor unions ahead of a vote Tuesday in Anaheim over a ‘living wage’ ballot initiative.  That proposal, Measure L, would require large hospitality employers that accept a city subsidy to pay their employees a ‘living wage” of $15/hour beginning in January with increases of $1/year until 2022.  After that point, wage hikes would be tied to the cost of living.  There is currently a debate over whether Disney falls within the scope of an employer under Measure L, as a result of construction bonds that were issued in 1996 to help Disney build a parking garage.  (Bed taxes from Disney and other parts of the city are being used to pay off the 40 year bonds).  While Anaheim’s City Attorney has issued an opinion that the bond agreement does not qualify as a subsidy, it is widely expected the matter will be resolved in court.  In the interim, Disney is not taking any chances as it seeks to prevent Measure L from being approved by Anaheim voters next week.



Readers will recall that I have highlighted the ongoing efforts of the Fight for $15 movement over the past few years.  While the movement has achieved some degree of success, it remains an ongoing and hard fought slog, especially in certain industries.  Kalena Thomhave wrote an article a few weeks ago and noted that the Fight for $15 movement is turning its attention to establishing unions at low wage places of employment, such as the fast food industry.  Thomhave highlighted the strikes by fast food workers recently as evidence that there is a desire (if not a grassroots underpinning) for a large scale union presence in the fast food industry.  Will anything come of it?  Perhaps, although like with the Fight for &15 movement itself, there likely will be no overnight or quickly won victories here.


Marriott Workers’ Strike Picks Up Steam

For those that have been reading the blog over the last few weeks, you likely recall the strike occurring by nearly 8,000 workers at the Marriott hotel chain & the picket lines that have popped up outside many Marriott properties. Drew Philip at The Guardian notes that the strikers have recently adopted the mantra ‘One Job Should Be Enough’ and have started to use that as a rallying cry at picket lines across the country.  As the article notes, strikes have become somewhat rare within the past few decades (compared to the hundreds that occurred every year in the 1960’s), nevertheless, Unite Here (which represents the striking Marriott workers) has called this “the largest multi-city hotel strike in North American history.”  Things are still touch and go on the negotiation front, but I highlight this article in particular to call attention to the new mantra adopted by the striking workers.  Will ‘One Job Should Be Enough’ achieve its intended result/catch on elsewhere?  Time will tell.


The Gig Economy & Department of Labor Opinion Letters

Bloomberg published an article a few weeks ago that speculated the Department of Labor would likely soon start zeroing in on the gig economy, specifically how to classify these workers as employees or independent contractors, via opinion letters.  (Department of Labor opinion letters help clarify employment and labor law related matters).  Given the continued focus on gig economy workers and the repeated requests that have started to pile up asking for the Department of Labor to address the matter, many legal experts expect opinion letters on the matter to be issued in the coming months.  This article from Bloomberg notes several of the requests made so far, for those looking for additional information on the matter.



The Fair Labor Standards Act: A Primer

Every month, I come across several Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") cases and developments to highlight.  With that being said, while I gloss over the basics of the FLSA and often dive right into one of the more nuanced portions of the Act which are in dispute in a given case, some readers might feel a bit in the dark about the entire scope of the FLSA itself.  Never to fear as Katie Clarey has an FLSA primer that touches on all the relevant portions of the Act as well as a few helpful guides on what employers can do to avoid liability for failing to pay their employees the proper wages due and owing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per