Skip to main content

Take a Seat: WalMart to Pay $65 Million to Resolve Suitable Seating Dispute


A few weeks ago, it was announced that WalMart agreed to pay $65 million to resolve a case brought against the company in regard to a California law which requires employers in the state to allow their employees to sit “whenever the nature of the work reasonably permits”.  While the law has been in place since 1911, it has been amended and expanded several times throughout the years.  (Bear in mind that WalMart is not the only employer to have been confronted with a suitable seating case as CVS, Home Depot, and Target, among others, have dealt with related claims in recent years).

In this instance, suit was filed in 2009 when a WalMart employee alleged that the company was in violation of the state’s suitable seating requirement.  The company based part of its argument on the idea that the nature of work performed by its cashiers does not reasonably permit the use of a seat as the cashiers would need to be able to move around, greet customers, and look inside carts, among other tasks.  Having cashiers that were seated presumably would not enable them to effectively perform their job, under WalMart’s argument.  Although WalMart denied any wrongdoing, the settlement was reached in an effort to avoid further cost and expense associated with a trial (that was set for later this year).  Under the proposed settlement, nearly 100,000 current and former WalMart cashiers would be able to receive a portion of the settlement.   (The payout per employee would vary, but it is expected that some longtime cashiers could receive upwards of $1,000/each).  Before the $65 million settlement can become final, however, it must be approved by a federal judge.

One of the more noteworthy portions of the settlement, besides the proposed $65 million, is the fact that WalMart has agreed to start a test program in which it would provide a stool for any WalMart cashier in California “who expresses a desire to use them”.  As well, the company has agreed that it would not discriminate or retaliate against any employee that chose to use a stool.

Something tells me that WalMart is not the last employer to be hit with a suitable seating lawsuit.  In the interim, it will be interesting to see whether the Judge approves the proposed settlement terms.


For additional information:  http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-walmart-settlement-20181012-story.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations