Skip to main content

Cleveland Cavaliers Hit With Age Discrimination Lawsuit By Former Assistant Coach


At the start of the month, a lawsuit was filed against the NBA's Cleveland Cavaliers by a former assistant coach, Jim Boylan, that alleged age discrimination against the team.  Boylan, 63, who served as an assistant coach with the Cavaliers from 2013 - 2018, did not have his contract renewed after the 2017 - 2018 season.  The suit names Koby Altman (the team's general manager), Dan Gilbert (owner of the team), Cavalier Holdings, LLC, and Cavaliers Operating Company, LLC as defendants in the case.

According to the lawsuit, the head coach of the Cavaliers at the time, Tyronn Lue, left Boylan a voicemail in June of 2018 and said "...I [Lue] had a talk with Koby [Altman] yesterday.  He does not want to pick up your option.  He said that's way too much money.  They're not going to pay that kind of money for three assistants on the bench.  He wants to go younger in that position, and you know, find somebody that's a grinder and younger in that position.  And he said he does not want to pick the option up for I guess it's 500 or - I'm not sure.  He said five something.  And he just said it's too much money, he said, so we'll be paying Longabardi and LD.  So he just said he wanted to go younger at that position and he does not want to pick up the option."

The lawsuit claims that 42 year old Damon Jones was promoted to Boylan's place.  Mike Longabardi, 45, and James Posey, 41, were retained on Lue's staff.  (However, Jones was fired in recent weeks along with Lue.)

Granted, there is still a lot that is not known in this matter, not to mention the fact that none of the defendants have filed an answer in the case.  However, the Cavaliers did release a statement stating that the option on whether to renew Boylan's contract was at the discretion of the team, as provided for in the negotiated and executed contract between the parties.  The statement concluded with the assertion that the lawsuit was nothing short of a cash grab.

With that being said, if Lue's comments are true in regard to the team wanting to go younger in the position (as the reason for not picking up an Boylan's option), that does not reflect well on the team's justification for replacing Boylan.  Couple that alleged statement from Lue with the allegation that Gilbert has "a pattern and practice of age discrimination across" his corporate organizations, if Boylan is able establish a pattern of age discrimination, that could prove to be trouble for the defendants in this case.  Readers might recall that one of Gilbert's companies, Quicken Loans, has been the subject of age discrimination lawsuits in the past.  But as a word of caution, an individual or employer that has been confronted with age, sex, race, or other related discrimination lawsuits previously does not necessarily mean there a pattern or practice of discrimination exists.  It takes very little for someone to file a discrimination lawsuit against an individual or employer.  A prior history of discrimination lawsuits alone should not be viewed as an admission of guilt or liability.

Stay tuned.


For a copy of the lawsuit filed November 1, 2018:  https://www.scribd.com/document/392204488/Jim-Boylan-lawsuit#from_embed

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more