Skip to main content

Cleveland Cavaliers Hit With Age Discrimination Lawsuit By Former Assistant Coach


At the start of the month, a lawsuit was filed against the NBA's Cleveland Cavaliers by a former assistant coach, Jim Boylan, that alleged age discrimination against the team.  Boylan, 63, who served as an assistant coach with the Cavaliers from 2013 - 2018, did not have his contract renewed after the 2017 - 2018 season.  The suit names Koby Altman (the team's general manager), Dan Gilbert (owner of the team), Cavalier Holdings, LLC, and Cavaliers Operating Company, LLC as defendants in the case.

According to the lawsuit, the head coach of the Cavaliers at the time, Tyronn Lue, left Boylan a voicemail in June of 2018 and said "...I [Lue] had a talk with Koby [Altman] yesterday.  He does not want to pick up your option.  He said that's way too much money.  They're not going to pay that kind of money for three assistants on the bench.  He wants to go younger in that position, and you know, find somebody that's a grinder and younger in that position.  And he said he does not want to pick the option up for I guess it's 500 or - I'm not sure.  He said five something.  And he just said it's too much money, he said, so we'll be paying Longabardi and LD.  So he just said he wanted to go younger at that position and he does not want to pick up the option."

The lawsuit claims that 42 year old Damon Jones was promoted to Boylan's place.  Mike Longabardi, 45, and James Posey, 41, were retained on Lue's staff.  (However, Jones was fired in recent weeks along with Lue.)

Granted, there is still a lot that is not known in this matter, not to mention the fact that none of the defendants have filed an answer in the case.  However, the Cavaliers did release a statement stating that the option on whether to renew Boylan's contract was at the discretion of the team, as provided for in the negotiated and executed contract between the parties.  The statement concluded with the assertion that the lawsuit was nothing short of a cash grab.

With that being said, if Lue's comments are true in regard to the team wanting to go younger in the position (as the reason for not picking up an Boylan's option), that does not reflect well on the team's justification for replacing Boylan.  Couple that alleged statement from Lue with the allegation that Gilbert has "a pattern and practice of age discrimination across" his corporate organizations, if Boylan is able establish a pattern of age discrimination, that could prove to be trouble for the defendants in this case.  Readers might recall that one of Gilbert's companies, Quicken Loans, has been the subject of age discrimination lawsuits in the past.  But as a word of caution, an individual or employer that has been confronted with age, sex, race, or other related discrimination lawsuits previously does not necessarily mean there a pattern or practice of discrimination exists.  It takes very little for someone to file a discrimination lawsuit against an individual or employer.  A prior history of discrimination lawsuits alone should not be viewed as an admission of guilt or liability.

Stay tuned.


For a copy of the lawsuit filed November 1, 2018:  https://www.scribd.com/document/392204488/Jim-Boylan-lawsuit#from_embed

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more