Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: November Edition


As always, there are some EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that stand out.


Whole Foods Settles Disability Discrimination Suit

Whole Foods has agreed to pay $65,000.00 to settle a disability discrimination suit filed by a former cashier at one of its locations in Raleigh, North Carolina.  This particular employee, hired in 2005, suffered from a kidney disease.  In 2009, she had a kidney transplant.  In 2015, she was hospitalized for a few days as a result of her condition and missed work.  Although Whole Foods was notified of the situation and the employee’s request for time off for her kidney impairment, Whole Foods ended up terminating her employment because of the absences.  This conduct is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) which prohibits employers from discriminating against employees because of a disability and requires employers to provide disabled employees with a reasonable accommodation (so long as it does not place an undue hardship on the employer).  While the reported facts are somewhat light in regard to any accommodation requested (and subsequently denied by Whole Foods), taking the facts on their face certainly leads to a conclusion that Whole Foods engageD in conduct in violation of the ADA.


Kansas City Wedding Venue Hit With Retaliation Suit

Earlier this month, the EEOC filed a lawsuit against 28 Event Space, LLC, a Kansas City wedding venue, on the grounds that the company retaliated against a black employee.  According to the suit, the owner of 28 Event Space, Doug Lytle, retaliated against one of his employees, Theopilis Bryant, after Bryant had testified as a witness in a race discrimination suit against a company where Lytle was the manager.  After unsuccessfully offering Bryant money and a used limousine (in an effort to keep him from testifying), Lytle apparently threatened Bryant’s job and eventually removed him from the 28 Event Space work schedule.  This alleged conduct is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits employers from retaliating against their employees, including because of the employee’s race.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more