Skip to main content

Senator Rubio Set to Formally Launch His Paid Family Leave Proposal


Following President Donald Trump's mention earlier this year in his State of the Union address about his support for paid family leave, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and one of President Trump's daughter, Ivanka Trump, began to discuss the options for advancing a paid family leave proposal through Congress.  After meeting with several members of Congress on the matter, Senator Rubio and Mrs. Trump outlined the basics of a paid family leave proposal that would allow workers to borrow from their Social Security benefits in order to obtain paid family leave. 

For those needing a refresher, the proposal would allow workers to draw from their Social Security benefits for up to 12 weeks each (or a total of 24 weeks for both spouses combined) for each child born or adopted.  In return for allowing these workers to draw from their Social Security benefits, their retirement benefits would be deferred for the amount of time necessary to offset the cost of obtaining the paid family leave.  

Supporters of this proposal have championed it as a logical solution to concerns that many have had over prior paid family leave proposals:  Not wanting to raise taxes or force employers to comply with a paid family leave plan.  However, critics had been quick to label this plan as essentially robbing Peter to pay Paul.  By allowing workers to draw from their Social Security benefits, that could further endanger the retirement program and force workers into financial hardship toward the tail end of their working years (if they were not able to obtain Social Security benefits for an extended time because they had previously drawn on those benefits for paid family leave).

However, while things had remained relatively stagnant after initial details came out about the plan, that appears to have changed as Senator Rubio is apparently set to formally launch the paid family leave proposal this week.  In fact, the Senate Committee on Finance is set to hold a hearing on the matter today.  This would mark the first step in moving the proposal toward a workable piece of legislation that could then eventually be put before the House and Senate for a vote.  Assuming the proposal would make it out of this Committee, it would likely then proceed to the rest of Congress for further debate on the matter.  If Senator Rubio can get Republicans to support this proposal, it could stand a good chance of passing (as Republicans control both the House and Senate and do not need any Democrats to support the measure for it to pass).



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more