Skip to main content

New York State Labor Review Board Finds Some Uber Driver Are Actually Employees


Recently, the New York State Labor Review Board made a ruling and determined that three former Uber drivers were actually employees, rather than independent contractors, for unemployment insurance purposes.  (Perhaps most importantly, this ruling applies to those three drivers and "similarly situated" drivers). For those that have been following the ongoing fight in the "gig economy" in regard to whether these workers are actually employees or independent contractors (as they have mainly been classified), this ruling could mark a major turning point in this struggle.

The question now turns to what Uber (and other related gig economy companies) will do.  Uber's official statement so far is that it disagrees with the ruling and is reviewing its options to determine how to proceed.  If Uber chooses to contest the New York State Labor Review Board's ruling, it will have to do so in court.

Should this ruling remain in place and Uber decide to abide by it, the potential ramifications could be massive.  For instance, Uber's workforce in New York City is believed to be more than 65,000.  If Uber drivers were classified as employees, rather than independent contractors, Uber would become the largest for profit private employer in the city.  Consequently, Uber would be required to begin making unemployment insurance contributions for its drivers.  The long term costs to Uber could be exponential, not even considering whether they would have to begin doing so elsewhere in the country.

Something tells me this is just the tip of the iceberg as other workers in the gig economy will point to this ruling as "precedent" for their related employee vs. independent contractor disputes.  In the meantime, it will be interesting to see what, if anything, Uber chooses to do to contest the decision.


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more