Skip to main content

Wave Goodbye: The Department of Labor Rescinds Persuader Rule


Let us file this one under the "unsurprising" category.  Yesterday, the Department of Labor formally rescinded the 'Persuader Rule', marking yet another blow over the past few weeks for labor unions.  The Persuader Rule, introduced in 2016 during President Barack Obama's administration, would have required employers or consultants to disclose any money paid for legal services when those services included "indirect persuasion" activities, including advice on what is to be said to employees in connection with a union organization campaign, as well as communications about the status of collective bargaining and contract proposals with rank and file employees.

Supporters of the Rule argued that its implementation was necessary in order to make union organization and elections more transparent.  (Of course, supporters of this Rule operated under the assumption that employers were engaging in underhanded and somewhat nefarious tactics to counter the growth of unions in the workplace.  As a result, they viewed this Rule as vital to the continued success of unions being able to continue conducting "fair" elections in the workplace and being able to represent their members effectively by requiring employers or consultants to reveal where/how they were spending money to combat union organization).

It did not take long for lawsuits to be filed over the Persuader Rule and before the Rule even went into effect a federal judge in Texas ended up issuing a nationwide injunction to block implementation of the Rule.  To the surprise of very few, the Department of Labor subsequently appealed that injunction.  (Bear in mind, that was the "Obama" Department of Labor that appealed the injunction...so the Department of Labor followed the lead of the President, at that time.  With President Donald Trump becoming President in recent years, he made the rescission of the Persuader Rule a priority and subsequently charged 'his' Department of Labor with following through.)  

As a result, yesterday, the Department of Labor issued a final rule to formally rescind the "Persuader Rule" and bring the matter to a close.  As noted, above, this was not much of a surprise, but is further bad news for labor unions and their supporters.  Their one hope, in regard to the Persuader Rule?  If a Democrat is elected President in 2020, perhaps that version of the Department of Labor will again try to implement a version of the Rule proposed by President Obama's Department of Labor.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more