Skip to main content

Florida's New Teachers Union Law Appears to Have Actually Increased Union Membership


Earlier this year, Florida passed a law that requires that membership in teachers unions in the state must be at least 50% of a district's teaching staff or the union could be disbanded.  Representative Scott Plakon, a sponsor of the bill, argued that its passage was necessary as he had seen that because some teachers unions had low membership totals for many years, it was indicative that the unions might not actually be doing a good job advocating for its members.  The theory went that if a teachers union could not maintain at least a 50% membership, this was evidence that it was not doing a good job advocating for its members and therefore should be disbanded.  (The bill originally sought to include police, firefighters, and correctional officers from other public employee unions, but was stripped down to only include teachers unions).  Once that bill became law earlier this month, a lawsuit was filed by the Florida Education Association that argued the bill was actually a union-busting measure that violated Florida's Constitution and unlawfully targeted public school teachers.

However, it is interesting to note that the bill appears to have actually spurred an increase in union membership.  Reports indicate that across the state, while 13 local teachers unions have membership below 50%, on the whole, membership has actually risen since the law was passed.  I doubt that supporters of this bill intended for it to be a boon for union membership.  Rather, whether they admit it publicly or not, it was likely passed to limit and possibly even diminish the power of teachers unions in the state.  For the time being, however, it appears that teachers unions are thriving, to some extent, since this bill's passage.  The question is whether these unions can maintain this increase in union membership once a lot of the attention and focus wears off.


For additional information:  http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/education/school-zone/os-teachers-union-lawsuit-folo-20180709-story.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per