Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Given the recent vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court, and the potential replacements which were reported to include Judges Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Raymond Kethledge, there has been significant attention given to the prior rulings by these Judges in an effort to glean any sort of insight into how they might rule, should they be confirmed by Congress.  Robin Shea has great articles that I enjoy reading through and her article from last Friday on the actual nominee to the high court (and some of his prior cases) is well worth a quick read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Boston Symphony Orchestra Flutist Files Equal Pay Lawsuit

Last week, a day after the new Massachusetts Equal Pay Law went into effect, a principal flutist of the Boston Symphony Orchestra ("BSO") sued on the grounds that the BSO discriminated against her on the basis of her gender by paying her a wage that was substantially less than other comparable males.  The flutist, Elizabeth Rowe, is currently the highest paid female principal player in the BSO and has been profiled as a soloist with the BSO 27 times since she was hired in 2004.  The suit alleged that one comparable male was reported to have earned about $280,000.00 in recent years, while Rowe was paid about $70,000.00 less.  In fact, the BSO's three other highest paid musicians are all male.  This suit is noticeable in so much that it appears to be the first gender pay equity claim filed under the new Massachusetts Equal Pay Law.  It will be interesting to see how this one plays out once the BSO responds to the suit.


A Closer Look at President Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee’s Employment & Labor Law Rulings

Robin Shea wrote a great series of articles recently that touched on some of the "finalists" for the recent vacancy on the United States Supreme Court and what their prior rulings on employment & labor law cases might foreshadow if they were placed on the high court.  Spoiler alert though, earlier this week, President Donald Trump formally nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to fill the vacancy left by Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement.  In this particular article, Judge Kavanaugh's prior rulings on several relevant cases include findings that:  1) an employer's onetime use of a racially inflammatory word can create a valid claim for a hostile work environment; 2) when an employer has ample legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons to fire an employee, that does not amount to a "pretext" for discrimination; 3) there is no right to union representation in peer review interviews; and 4) a union policy that members that wanted to resign from the union or stop having their dues automatically deducted from their paychecks be required to come to the union office with a photo ID and a written request was coercive and illegal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per