The City of Austin recently approved a somewhat controversial paid leave ordinance on February 5, 2018. I call it controversial because pro-business groups and employers have been vocal critics of the ordinance for a handful of reasons (namely that the paid leave ordinance violates the Texas Constitution). With the recent filing of a lawsuit in District Court in Austin and a few developments on the matter as of late, I thought it would be appropriate to dedicate this post to the topic.
As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.
Austin's Paid Leave Ordinance Goes to Court
The National Law Review has a good overview of the lawsuit filed by several business groups and staffing agencies that are seeking to invalidate a City of Austin paid sick leave ordinance set to go into effect on October 1, 2018. (While I linked readers to the petition, above, The National Law Review breaks things down in a concise and easy to follow format). The ordinance would require businesses with more than 15 employees to
provide eight days of paid sick leave. Businesses with fewer than 15
employees would be required to provide six days of paid sick leave.
(Employees would be able to accrue one hour of sick leave for every 30
hours worked). However, the lawsuit argues that the paid leave ordinance violates minimum wage laws as employers would be required to pay employees for time spent away from work (which would equate to employers being required to pay more than minimum wage). No answer has been filed to the lawsuit as of yet. However, something tells me this one will soon start to garner widespread attention statewide and across the country.
Texas Attorney General Seeks To Limit Austin's Paid Leave Ordinance
On Monday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a plea in intervention in the recently filed lawsuit that is challenging the City of Austin paid leave ordinance. The Attorney General argues that the minimum amount of compensation established for workers is laid out in the Texas Constitution. As a result, the Attorney General stipulates that the paid leave ordinance "is an attempt to unlawfully and inappropriately usurp the authority of the state lawmakers...". Had I known the Attorney General's position on the matter, I would have talked with him about this when I met with him a few weeks ago in Dallas. Perhaps another time...
Coalition Uses Austin's Paid Leave Ordinance As Inspiration to Push For Similar Measure in San Antonio
Stanford Nowlin at the San Antonio Current wrote an article recently in which he noted that a coalition has started to push for a paid leave ordinance in San Antonio, as a result of the success of Austin passing one back in February. Using Austin's paid leave ordinance as a catalyst, labor and community groups are trying to get a ballot measure before voters in the city to consider whether to approve a paid leave ordinance for workers in San Antonio. In order to get the matter before voters, approximately 75,000 signatures are needed from eligible voters. While this still has a ways to go, it appears the success of getting a paid leave ordinance passed in Austin (notwithstanding the recent lawsuit) is inspiring other cities to attempt to do the same.
Comments
Post a Comment