Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


As a result of several major developments out of New Jersey as of late, I think it it only makes sense to have an article dealing with the state's new paid sick leave bill lead off this post.  The one thing I am curious to see is whether other states follow New Jersey's lead and attempt to pass similar legislation.  As this first article addresses, the impact (both positive and negative) of this new paid sick leave bill could be telling as to whether any states do indeed follow suit.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



After New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed a paid sick leave bill into law last week, attention has now turned to the impact this bill will have on employers and employees alike in the state.  Although the law will not go into effect for about 180 days, now is the time for employers to ensure they are in compliance.  As Jennifer Fischer and Mark Konkel write, this new bill preempts all existing municipal and county sick leave laws already in place.  However, for employers that are already offering paid leave that is accrued at a rate equal to or greater than the new legislation passed, they will be considered to be in compliance.  In regard to exceptions/exemptions, they are relatively narrow:  Certain small businesses (with less than 10 employees) can "cap" the number of hours an employee can accrue at 40; and per diem health care workers and construction workers are exempt if they are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.


Vote to Raise Minimum Wage in Connecticut Falls Short in State Legislature

Christine Stuart at CT New Junkie wrote earlier this week that efforts to raise the hourly minimum wage rate in the state from $10.10/hour (the current rate) to $12/hour by 2020 fell short in the Connecticut Legislature.  There was widespread concern over whether supporters of the bill would have enough votes to approve the legislation if the bill made it out of committee.  In fact, one State Senator, Joan Hartley (a Democrat), indicated she would vote for a bill that would raise the hourly minimum wage to $15/hour so that the measure would make it out of committee but would not vote for its passage on the Senate floor.  Questions arose as to whether she would even support a $12/hour minimum wage bill.  As a result, the measure which would have raised the state's hourly minimum wage rate to $12/hour by 2020 did not even make it to a vote in either chamber.  This comes on the heels of a similar bill in 2016 that failed to garner enough support to become law.  Perhaps advocates of a minimum wage hike will re-group and try again in 2020??

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...