Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: FMLA Edition


This week, I came across several well researched FMLA articles that I found to be relevant and useful to employers and HR readers alike.  While some employers or HR professionals might not deal with FMLA matters often (if at all), FMLA is such a hot button issue for many that I think it is appropriate to dedicate this post solely to that topic.  I remind readers, as always, to consult the law in their particular state/circuit as to any FMLA issues they may confront before deciding how to act on a particular situation.  However, the below articles are well worth a read for all, regardless of the state/circuit you find yourself.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Reminder to Employers: Make Sure to Notify Employees When Their FMLA Leave is About to End

A few attorneys at Jackson Lewis have been writing a series lately on common mistakes employers can make in regard to FMLA leave.  In this most recent article, they remind employers to ensure that they notify employees before the FMLA leave expires.  As readers recall, the FMLA provides eligible employees the option to take protected, unpaid leave for up to 12 work weeks over a 12 month period.  However, failure to notify an employee that they are about to exhaust their leave and subsequently terminating that employee can expose the employer to liability.  To illustrate the point, two relevant cases from Kentucky and Illinois are noted as a reminder to employers that this issue has come up many times and been decided in favor of the employees.  As the article correctly points out, communication with employees prior to the FMLA leave ending is pivotal before any steps are taken to terminate an employee.  


Fifth Circuit Opinion Provides Guidance As to Whether Employees Can Voluntarily Work During FMLA Leave

Recently, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in D’Onofrio v. Vacation Publications, Inc. which addressed whether an employee can voluntarily choose to work during FMLA leave without an employer risking a lawsuit for denying the employee entitlements under the FMLA.  JDSupra recently wrote an article in regard to this case to remind employers that giving employees the option to work while on FMLA leave does not amount to interference with FMLA rights so long as working while on leave is not a condition of employment.  With that being said, note that the FMLA does not prohibit an employer from contacting an employee during leave with a de minims request or short and simple questions.  However, as the article suggests, employers would be wise to limit contact with employees that are on FMLA leave so as to avoid any possible claim of wrongfully denying the employee entitlements under FMLA.


'Honest Belief' Valid Defense to FMLA Retaliation Claim, According to Third Circuit Court

Casey Green wrote a brief note recently about a Third Circuit court which held that an employer's honest belief that an employee was misusing FMLA leave was a valid defense when confronted with an FMLA retaliation claim.  Similar to the Fifth Circuit case, above, I remind readers to review the relevant case law in their state/circuit to determine what applicable standards and defenses apply to FMLA cases.  Regardless, this Third Circuit case, Capps v. Mondelez Global, LLC, is noteworthy and well worth a review.


Are Employees That Use FMLA Leave Required to Follow Call-In Procedures?

Whether employees that are on FMLA leave are required to follow an employer's call-in procedures is one of the more nuanced questions that often arises in regard to the FMLA.  Luckily, Jennifer Carson at HRDrive provides a clear and concise answer:  Yes, but make sure the policy is consistently enforced for all employees (those on FMLA leave and those that simply call in sick, unrelated to FMLA leave).  Employers would be wise to have a policy in place that applies to all employees and stipulates when the employee must call in (for instance, no later than an hour before their shift is to start), who the call should be directed to, what the content of the call should be, etc.  However, note that an exception is carved out for employees on FMLA leave.  The requirement to follow an employer's call-in procedure can be excused if an unusual circumstance arises (such as an emergency that prevents the employee from calling in).  If there is one takeaway for employers here, it would be to ensure that the call-in procedure is uniformly applied to all employees.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...