Skip to main content

From Pom Poms to the Courtroom: Houston Texans Edition


Over the past few years, N.F.L. (and N.B.A.) cheerleaders have filed a wide range of Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and discrimination claims against their teams and the leagues.  For those needing a refresher, we have had several teams involved in these suits including the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Jets, Buccaneers, Raiders (again), Bucks, and Saints.  While some cases have resulted in settlements, others have continued on without a resolution as of yet.  The sticking point for many of these cases is that they involve mandatory arbitration provisions...which would take the cases out of the court system and prevent class actions.

Earlier this week, the Houston Texans joined the list of teams that have been confronted with FLSA and discrimination claims.  Yesterday, an amended lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas which seeks class action status.  The suit claimed that while the cheerleaders were paid $7.25/hour (the hourly minimum wage rate in Texas), it is alleged that the cheerleaders were not paid for "off the clock" and overtime work over 40 hours in a week.  This "off the clock" work included time spent traveling to and from events, monitoring work e-mail to respond to work matters, and preparing for gameday events.  The suit also claimed that cheerleaders were subject to harassment by their coach with some cheerleaders being told they had "belly jelly", were a "chunky cheek", and other related comments about their appearance.

While the Texans have not filed a formal answer yet, a team spokeswoman said that the Texans were proud of its cheerleader program and that hundreds of women had enjoyed their participation in it.  (Yes, that is far from an answer or response to the suit...but that is what we have to go on so far).

At this point, it is still far too early to say how this will play out.  With that being said, given that N.F.L. cheerleader lawsuits have tapered out (somewhat) over the past few years, will this lawsuit encourage others to follow suit?


For a copy of the lawsuit:  https://www.scribd.com/document/379890573/Texans-cheerleaders-lawsuit#from_embed
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more