Skip to main content

From Pom Poms to the Courtroom: Houston Texans Edition


Over the past few years, N.F.L. (and N.B.A.) cheerleaders have filed a wide range of Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and discrimination claims against their teams and the leagues.  For those needing a refresher, we have had several teams involved in these suits including the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Jets, Buccaneers, Raiders (again), Bucks, and Saints.  While some cases have resulted in settlements, others have continued on without a resolution as of yet.  The sticking point for many of these cases is that they involve mandatory arbitration provisions...which would take the cases out of the court system and prevent class actions.

Earlier this week, the Houston Texans joined the list of teams that have been confronted with FLSA and discrimination claims.  Yesterday, an amended lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas which seeks class action status.  The suit claimed that while the cheerleaders were paid $7.25/hour (the hourly minimum wage rate in Texas), it is alleged that the cheerleaders were not paid for "off the clock" and overtime work over 40 hours in a week.  This "off the clock" work included time spent traveling to and from events, monitoring work e-mail to respond to work matters, and preparing for gameday events.  The suit also claimed that cheerleaders were subject to harassment by their coach with some cheerleaders being told they had "belly jelly", were a "chunky cheek", and other related comments about their appearance.

While the Texans have not filed a formal answer yet, a team spokeswoman said that the Texans were proud of its cheerleader program and that hundreds of women had enjoyed their participation in it.  (Yes, that is far from an answer or response to the suit...but that is what we have to go on so far).

At this point, it is still far too early to say how this will play out.  With that being said, given that N.F.L. cheerleader lawsuits have tapered out (somewhat) over the past few years, will this lawsuit encourage others to follow suit?


For a copy of the lawsuit:  https://www.scribd.com/document/379890573/Texans-cheerleaders-lawsuit#from_embed
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more