Skip to main content

New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Equal Pay Law


New Jersey has been on quite the roll lately, right?  Last week I noted the paid sick leave bill that Governor Phil Murphy signed into law.  This week, I want to note an equal pay bill that Governor Murphy recently signed into law as well.

Readers might recall that a similar equal pay bill was vetoed by former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie a few years ago when he was Governor of the state.  But as the saying goes, there is a new sheriff in town.  (And this particular sheriff, well Governor, has made signing an equal pay bill a major focal point of his administration).

The Diane B. Allen Equal Pay Act is the nation's strongest law that combats both gender pay discrimination and wage discrimination in New Jersey.  (The Act is named after a former New Jersey state senator that was a victim of pay discrimination).  The Act addresses wage discrimination in several ways:  1) it increases the possibility that women can uncover wage discrimination (pay differences among genders would be permitted only if the employer could show the difference was based upon seniority, education and training, or merit); 2) it strengthens the legal tools women can used when seeking justice; 3) it expands the number of years of back pay a victim can recover (from the previous two years to now up to six years); and 4) it deters companies from perpetuating wage discrimination (by requiring companies that bid for public contracts to report salaries by race, ethnicity, and gender by job category).

Interesting to note that the Act also protects employees that discuss their pay with fellow coworkers.  Employers are now prohibited from retaliating against employees who discuss their wages with each other and are prohibited from requiring employees to sign non-disclosure agreements.

Under this new law, set to to into effect on July 1, employers found to be in violation can be liable for triple damages to aggrieved employees.  This does not give employers much time to ensure they are in compliance.  I would suggest that employers in the state start getting their ducks in a row...July 1 will be here quickly.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per