Skip to main content

New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Equal Pay Law


New Jersey has been on quite the roll lately, right?  Last week I noted the paid sick leave bill that Governor Phil Murphy signed into law.  This week, I want to note an equal pay bill that Governor Murphy recently signed into law as well.

Readers might recall that a similar equal pay bill was vetoed by former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie a few years ago when he was Governor of the state.  But as the saying goes, there is a new sheriff in town.  (And this particular sheriff, well Governor, has made signing an equal pay bill a major focal point of his administration).

The Diane B. Allen Equal Pay Act is the nation's strongest law that combats both gender pay discrimination and wage discrimination in New Jersey.  (The Act is named after a former New Jersey state senator that was a victim of pay discrimination).  The Act addresses wage discrimination in several ways:  1) it increases the possibility that women can uncover wage discrimination (pay differences among genders would be permitted only if the employer could show the difference was based upon seniority, education and training, or merit); 2) it strengthens the legal tools women can used when seeking justice; 3) it expands the number of years of back pay a victim can recover (from the previous two years to now up to six years); and 4) it deters companies from perpetuating wage discrimination (by requiring companies that bid for public contracts to report salaries by race, ethnicity, and gender by job category).

Interesting to note that the Act also protects employees that discuss their pay with fellow coworkers.  Employers are now prohibited from retaliating against employees who discuss their wages with each other and are prohibited from requiring employees to sign non-disclosure agreements.

Under this new law, set to to into effect on July 1, employers found to be in violation can be liable for triple damages to aggrieved employees.  This does not give employers much time to ensure they are in compliance.  I would suggest that employers in the state start getting their ducks in a row...July 1 will be here quickly.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...