Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


This week we have a little something for everyone:  minimum wage, ERISA, paid leave, and Human Resources topics.  With that being said, Amazon’s announcement on Tuesday that the company would implement an hourly wage hike up to $15/hour for all U.S. workers by November 1st takes the cake.  A lot has been written on the matter since Tuesday’s announcement by the company, although I have chosen to highlight the article from The New York Times as it provides one of the more concise summaries as to Amazon’s news. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


By November 1st, $15/Hour Wage Rate to Go Into Effect For Amazon Employees

In a somewhat surprising announcement, on Tuesday, Amazon announced that it would raise the hourly wage rate for its U.S. employees to $15/hour, effective November 1st of this year.  As Karen Weise at The New York Times reports, this hourly wage increase will impact more than 250,000 employees including workers at Whole Foods as well as seasonal workers that will be hired for the upcoming Christmas season.  Amazon’s CEO Jeff Bezos announced the company’s news with an encouragement to other companies to follow suit.  Some have noted that this hourly wage increase is unexpected, in so much that it takes effect in less than a month, rather than being fazed in over time.  Will other large scale employers follow suit?  Time will tell.


ERISA Statutory Penalties & An Employer’s Liability

I have had requests for additional discussion as to ERISA cases and related developments on that front.  Say no more.  Here, Jackson Lewis put out an article earlier this week that reminded employers that even when they hand off to an independent third party to administer ERISA welfare benefit plans, employers can still be liable for statutory penalties associated with participat document requests.  Pointing to a case from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to help illustrate the point, this article is well worth a review for those interested in a somewhat nuanced topic in relation to ERISA.


With Paid Sick Leave in Limbo in Austin, Local Business Proactive in Covering Paid Leave Costs

Earlier this year, I noted that the city of Austin passed a paid sick leave ordinance that would have required employers in the city with more than 15 employees to provide their employees up to 8 days of paid sick leave per year.  Businesses with fewer than 15 employees would have been required to provide up to 6 days of paid sick leave.  Much to the chagrin of paid sick leave advocates, a lawsuit was filed and challenged the ordinance as being in violation of the Texas Constitution and a subsequent injunction was issued to block the ordinance from taking effect.  Undeterred, one restaurant in Austin has not let that lawsuit and injunction stop them from offering paid leave to their employees.  As the KXAN article notes, Hoover’s Cooking has started to add $1 to every bill to provide a source of funding for paid leave for the restaurant’s employees.  For the time being, there does not appear to be much resistance to this effort to provide paid leave to the restaurant’s employees (via the $1 ‘charge’ passed onto customers) while the legal challenge to the city’s paid sick leave ordinance works its way through the court system.  Will other employers in the city follow suit?  Perhaps.  Although the future success of this plan likely rests, in large part, on consumers being willing to shoulder these additional charges.


Artificial Intelligence & Human Resources: An Uneasy Alliance?

Barbara Van Pay wrote a recent article that highlighted how more and more employers are starting to rely upon artificial intelligence (‘AI’) to assist with Human Resources matters.  For instance, one company that specializes in AI, claims that their AI candidate sorting algorithm reduces time to hire from 34 days down to 9.  Using AI to assist with the hiring process can allow AI to quickly sort through resumes, check educational and employment records, and sort candidates for recruiters/employers in a shorter amount of time than if an actual person was working on the same tasks.  Some predict that in the coming years, AI will allow employers to better collect data on the workplace, policies, procedures, and other related employee matters.  Doing so will enable employers to more efficiently analyze the workplace and take ‘engagement down to the individual level’.  While those in Human Resources likely do not need to start updating their resumes just yet, some day (hopefully not too soon) it might be AI that is assisting your next potential employer sort & consider your application.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more