Skip to main content

Ahead of Election Day, At Least One Employer Is Offering Paid Time Off to Vote


For those readers that have not already early voted, some states still allow a few additional days to get your votes in.  For everyone else, next Tuesday is election day across the country.  While some readers might live in states where mail-in ballots are allowed, others have to go to a polling place in their community to cast their ballot.  However, many voters struggle with finding the time to go vote when they have work, family, childcare, and other life responsibilities that occupies a majority of their day when the polls are opened.  That often leaves precious little time to actually go to the polls and wait in line.

With that being said, at least one employer, Cava, has been reported to be offering its 1,600 hourly employees two hours of paid leave to head to the polls today.  Some have reported that Cava is the first national restaurant group of its kind to offer this benefit to its hourly workers.

Whether or not this trend (of large employers) offering paid time off to hourly employees to vote catches on elsewhere is hard to predict (although note that some states actually require paid time off be offered).  Nevertheless, this effort by Cava should be applauded as a proactive measure to accommodate its workers that want to vote but find it difficult to do during the workday.  This type of good will gesture by an employer can often pay dividends with workers in the long run as employees feel a sense of pride in their workplace, commitment to an employer they believe actually cares about them, and a renewed sense of dedication to their work.  It will be interesting to see whether this paid time off "movement" gains steam ahead of the 2020 general election.


For additional information:  https://www.washingtonian.com/2018/10/22/cava-will-give-its-1600-employees-paid-leave-to-vote-on-election-day/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more