Skip to main content

Fourth & Long: Initiative 77 On the Verge of Being Repealed


This past June, voters in the District of Columbia approved a ballot measure, Initiative 77, that would have eliminated the two tier wage system and was set to raise the hourly pay rate for tipped workers in the city from its current rate of $3.33/hour up to $15/hour in the coming years.  The first wage hike was set to go into effect today, October 9th.  While Initiative 77 was approved with room to spare, opponents of the measure started to urge the D.C. Council to take steps to repeal it.  Critics of Initiative 77 had long argued that the wording of the measure was needlessly complex and poorly worded, not to mention the claim that businesses in the District would struggle to cover these rising labor costs.  As a result, not long after Initiative 77 was approved by voters, the D.C. Council began to confer and hold hearings on whether to repeal or delay the implementation of the wage hike.

Well lo and behold, last week, the D.C. Council held a vote and with an 8 - 5 vote against Initiative 77, came one step closer toward repealing the measure.  Next stop:  Mayor Muriel Bowser who will have the choice on whether to sign the repeal bill or reject it.  Those who have closely followed the matter have pointed out that Mayor Bowser has previously expressed her opposition to Initiative 77.  As a result, it is widely expected that the Mayor will sign the repeal bill.

It is worth noting that prior to the repeal of Initiative being approved by the D.C. Council, emergency legislation was passed to delay the implementation of Initiative 77 from today until next March.  In all likelihood, this is a stopgap to kick the can down the road while the D.C. Council continues to work to fully repeal the measure.

At the moment, the future of Initiative 77 looks cloudy at best.  Stay tuned.


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more