Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


What turned into a busy week of work travel seems to be what I likely have scheduled for the next few weeks.  Excuse the brief post this week as spending a significant amount of time on the road this week left me with little downtime.  In the interim, I call attention to a proposition that will be on the ballot for voters in Missouri this coming Election Day.  If approved, hourly workers could see a minimum wage increase up to $12/hour within the next few years.  While here are several relevant employment law related measures before voters across the state next month, that one in particular is worth keeping an eye on. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Can Foster Parents Take Additional FMLA Leave After They Adopt a Child?

Jeff Nowak at FMLA Insights addressed a reader question earlier this week in regard to whether a foster parent is entitled to additional FMLA leave once they actually adopt the child.  While Jeff goes in depth and fully addresses the topic, in short, a foster parent is not entitled to additional FMLA leave once they actually adopt the child.  Give the article a read for additional insights; it is well worth it.


Missouri Voters to Decide on Proposition B, a Minimum Wage Proposal, on Election Day

Fresh off the heals of defeating right to work in the state earlier this year, voters in Missouri will have an opportunity to raise the statewide minimum wage rate up to $12/hour by 2023.  As Celeste Bott at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch writes, after prior efforts to raise minimum wage rates in the state were defeated a few years ago, minimum wage advocates are feeling a sense of optimism ahead of the November 6th vote.  Proposition B, the minimum wage proposal, would raise the statewide hourly minimum wage rate from $7.85/hour to $8.60/hour starting January 1st and then increase by a rate of $.85/hour every year until 2023.  While there is no definitive front runner on how the proposition will play out, it is noticeable that significant money has been spent in support of it heading into Election Day.  That big spending seemed to work out back in August when right to work was defeated.  Perhaps there will be a repeat come November 6th?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per