Skip to main content

Department of Labor Extends PAID Program An Additional Six Months


Earlier this year, I made note of the Department of Labor’s Payroll Audit Independent Determination (‘PAID’) program which would allow employers to self report and remedy wage and hour violations without penalty, so long as employers got their ‘aggrieved’ employees their owed back pay and the employer was not a prior offender.  The PAID program went into effect April 3rd and was set to be in place for approximately six months before the Department of Labor would review the program to determine whether to extend, modify, or terminate it completely.  Critics quickly argued it was nothing more than a ‘get out of jail free’ card for some employers that failed to actually curtail wage and hour violators.  However, advocates of the PAID program pointed out that it remedied unpaid wage issues without an extended delay and did not require employees to shoulder legal fees to fight for the wages they were owed.

On Tuesday, the Department of Labor announced it would extend the PAID program for an additional six months.  Readers are likely wondering whether the program has achieved its desired impact.  From internal reports, it appears that in the initial six months of the program, approximately nine employees participated with unpaid wages totaling more than $500,000.00.  While the Department of Labor had not set any specific benchmarks for what would/would not be considered a success for the program, these initial numbers seem promising.  Of course, critics will likely still argue that while these apparent numbers are a good start, the PAID program still fails to get at the root of the problem when it comes to employers not paying their employees the full wages due and owing.  Regardless, it will be interesting to see what numbers are reported after the close of this next six month period.


For additional information:  https://www.allongeorgia.com/national-news/u-s-depart-of-labor-announces-record-304m-in-recovered-wages-for-workers-in-fiscal-year-2018/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per