Skip to main content

Breaking: Democrats Drop Plans to Include Paid Leave In Proposed Tax & Spending Plan


Late this afternoon, it was announced that Democrats were dropping plans to include a planned twelve weeks of paid leave from a proposed tax and spending plan working its way through Congress.

As some readers might have heard, Congressional Democrats have been in negotiations over the size and scope of a proposed tax and spending plan for several weeks now.  While there has been broad consensus among Democrats about the need to approve a tax and spending plan while they have majority control of the House, Senate, and White House (and can approve such a measure without Republican support), the point of contention among Democrats has been about the size (and cost) of the tax and spending plan.

It has been reported that Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema have been the two Democratic hold ups in negotiations.  Both Senators Manchin and Sinema have been reported to favor a lower tax and spending plan.  In doing so, that would require something (or multiple things) to be cut from the tax and spending plan…with paid leave recently being placed on the chopping block.  While there was talk of reducing the paid leave to four weeks and some hope that paid family leave (but not paid sick leave) could survive negotiations, it appears paid leave is off the table in its entirely.

Granted, I would not call this the end of the road for those hoping that Congress approves some sort of paid leave legislation.  (After all, as recently as a few years ago, Republicans were voicing their support for paid leave.)  However, for the time being, it appears paid leave will not make it into this tax and spending plan.


For additional information:  The point of contention among Democrats has been about the size (and cost) of the tax and spending plan

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more