Skip to main content

NLRB General Counsel: College Athletes Are “Employees” Under the NLRA

 

Are you sitting down for this one?  If not, take a minute before reading further.

On September 29th, National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo issued a memo in which she stated that college athletes at private colleges/universities should be classified as employees under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”).  According to Abruzzo, these college athletes provide a financial benefit to their colleges/universities while the colleges/universities control the athletic activities of the players.  Abruzzo’s argument followed that these college athletes not being classified as employees is a violation of the NLRA.

Some readers might be thinking…ok, so what?  In short, if college athletes are found to be employees, they would gain the right organize and form a union, be entitled to compensation, open universities up to unemployment insurance/compensation matters, etc.

A few years ago, football players at Northwestern University had attempted to unionize but those efforts fell short when the NLRB held that the matter was out of its jurisdiction.  Notably, the NLRB did not rule on whether the Northwestern football players were actually employees.  In short, the NLRB kicked the can down the road.  Things have slowly started to trend the other way in recent years, namely with the United States Supreme Court holding in NCAA v. Alston that college athletes have a right to be compensated for their image and likeness.

It is important to note that Abruzzo’s memo does not set legal precedent or create new law.  With that being said, it does set things in motion for the NLRB to issue a decision holding that college athletes are employees.  If/when that does happen, however, it would only impact college athletes at private colleges/universities rather than public schools.  With that being said, if/when an eventual decision is handed down from the NLRB, the floodgates will open.


For a copy of Abruzzo’s memo:  https://apps.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d458356ec26

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more