Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Paid time off, vaccine accommodation requests, and pronouns in the workplace.  To say we are running the gamut of employment law topics this weeks is an understatement.  Regardless of your preferred article, each of the below articles has a bit of a nuanced look at a particular development on the given matter.  I encourage readers to page through each as these are relevant updates worth a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Congressmen Call for Better Paid Time Off For Workers to Get Vaccinated

Last Friday, Congressmen Jerry Nadler and Alex Padilla wrote a letter to Marty Walsh, Secretary of Labor at the Labor Department, and Jeff Zients, the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, calling for the adoption of more paid time off for workers to get the coronavirus vaccine.  In the letter, the Congressmen ask the Labor Department to determine if paid time off can be provided to workers for vaccination related time away from work as well as for the Labor Department to clarify any requirements related to paid time off while getting the vaccine.  Given that the White House is working hand in hand with the Labor Department to encourage vaccinations in the workplace, it will be interesting to see if this letter spurs either the Labor Department or White House toward action.


United Airlines Hit With Lawsuit Alleging Failure to Accommodate

On September 21st, a lawsuit was filed against United Airlines by several workers that claim the company violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to accommodate employees that sought exemptions from the company’s vaccine mandate.  United, as with many other employers, instituted vaccine mandates for its workers a few months ago.  While certain religious or medical exemptions might have enabled workers to forgo this vaccine mandate, the lawsuit alleges that United violated federal law by failing to accommodate these exemption requests from workers.  The lawsuit, Sambrano v. United Airlines Inc., is still in the early stages of litigation but worth keeping an eye on over the coming months.


Employer Hit With $30,000 Judgment in Pronoun Discrimination Lawsuit

Pronouns in the workplace…a point of contention (or pride) for many.  This article notes a recent judgment from the British Columbia Human Rights Council (“Council”) that found an employer unlawfully discriminated against a non-binary, gender fluid, transgender worker who was ultimately terminated.  The lawsuit alleged that the worker requested “they/them” pronouns be used in the workplace, but coworkers instead used “she/her/sweetheart/honey” pronouns.  The employee was summarily terminated a few days later after a stand off with coworkers (including a bar manager) over the pronouns.  The Council held that the termination was not unlawful because of the requested use of pronouns but instead because the employee was transgender.  For those looking for a bit more reading on pronouns in the workplace (and the potential pratfalls that might arise), this article is worth a quick read.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more