Skip to main content

Southwest Airlines Pilots Association Files Suit Contesting Airline’s Vaccine Mandate


Last Friday, the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association asked a federal judge to issue an injunction to prohibit Southwest’s requirement that all pilots be vaccinated from going into effect.

As readers might have seen, Southwest is one of many airlines that have instituted vaccine mandates for its workers.  These mandates require airline employees be vaccinated by the start of December or risk being terminated.  Naturally, there has been some pushback across the board, including with this lawsuit by the union representing Southwest’s pilots.  The lawsuit, pending in federal court in the Northern District of Texas, argues that the vaccine mandate unlawfully imposes new terms and conditions of employment, in violation of the collective bargaining agreement currently in place.  As a result, the union is asking an injunction be issued to prohibit the mandate from going into effect until the pending lawsuit is resolved.

Whether an injunction is issued remains to be seen.  While the union has requested a hearing on the matter, it is unclear if/when a hearing would be held.  For the time being, Southwest’s vaccine mandate remains in place…but if I were a betting man, I would not be confident that it will remain.  After all, this past weekend’s issues with thousands of cancelled Southwest flights and a rumored “sickout” by its pilots makes me think this story will continue to evolve.  Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-09/southwest-air-pilots-seek-to-block-covid-vaccination-mandate

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more