Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Given that Senator Marco Rubio finally introduced his paid family leave proposal this week (after several false starts), I think it is appropriate to lead off this post with a closer examination of his proposal.  This one still has a long ways to go before becoming law, but some of the specifics of the bill are worth a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Senator Marco Rubio Formally Unveils Economic Security for New Parents Act

At long last, Florida Senator Marco Rubio has rolled out his proposed paid family leave plan yesterday, dubbed the "Economic Security for New Parents Act".  I have attached a fact sheet from Senator Rubio's website which breaks down some of the specifics of the plan.  Readers might recall that this proposed paid family leave bill would allow workers to borrow from their Social Security benefits in order to cover their paid leave.  In return for borrowing from their Social Security benefits, these workers would have to delay their right to receive those benefits for a set period once they reached retirement age.  It is worth noting that fellow Republican Senators Joni Ernst (from Iowa) and Mike Lee (from Utah) had originally been in talks to co-sponsor the legislation, however they did not sign on prior to Senator Rubio introducing the legislation yesterday.  Their reason for not doing so?  They apparently could not agree on the details in the bill.  Hmmm.  Somewhat troubling for supporters of this bill, but it is still early in the ballgame here.


Ban The Box Has Turned 20: A Look At Some of the Challenges Going Forward

Jennifer Carsen at HRDive wrote an article earlier this week that noted while ban the box has turned 20 (well, on July 15th that is), there are still challenges that employers face going forward when implementing this initiative.  In her article, Carsen pinpoints several things employers can do to ensure compliance with ban the box laws (as they can vary from city to city and state to state), such as adopting a national ban the box policy that attempts to comply with as many ban the box laws as possible.  Regardless of whether an employee is a national company or only operates within one state or city, this article is worth a review for some well thought out insights.


A Closer Look At Addressing Whether HR Discussions Are Confidential & The Purpose of Exit Interviews

On Tuesday, Johnny Taylor Jr. at USA Today discussed whether an employee's conversation with HR is confidential and what purpose an exit interview actually serves.  As Taylor points out, if an employee raises an issue in a discussion with HR that concerns potential liability for the organization or an issue that could significantly impact the business or other employees, the HR representative is more often than not obligated to discuss the matter with those that need to know within the company.  As a result, a confidential mediation discussion can sometimes result in the discussion not being confidential after all, despite what an employee might think.  Taylor proceeds to address what purpose an exit interview, a discussion that should be highly relevant to both employers and employees alike.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more