Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: August Edition


As always, there are some EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that stand out.


The University of Wisconsin System Hit With Age Discrimination Suit

At the start of the month, the EEOC announced that an age discrimination suit had been filed against the University of Wisconsin System after a 53 year old former employee applied for six different positions, and although apparently well qualified with 25 years of experience, the University instead hired a 23 year old candidate with less than 2 years of experience.  The suit alleged that the University refused to hire the former employee because of her age.  If this conduct is proven to be true, it would be in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 which prohibits an employer from discriminating against an employee or applicant on the basis of their age.


EEOC Files Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Suit Against Piggly Wiggly

According to a lawsuit filed by the EEOC, Rockdale Grocery, Inc. d/b/a Piggly Wiggly, subjected two female employees to lewd sexual comments and sexual advances from a male employee.  Although this conduct was reported to a store manager on several occasions, the company apparently failed to take any action to stop the harassment.  Instead, the suit alleged that the company cut the hours of one of the female employees after she complained and later fired both employees after they filed a written complaint about the harassment.  Readers might have concluded that this conduct, if proven to be true, is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits sexual harassment and bars employers from retaliating against employees that report this harassment.



Recently, the EEOC and Coca-Cola announced a settlement agreement that had been entered into to improve the company's policies and practices for accommodation of employees with disabilities.  With this settlement, it resolves nine charges of discrimination that alleged the company had failed to properly accommodate employees with disabilities.  The settlement agreement includes Coca-Cola improving accommodations to employees that have returned to work after disability related absences.  As well, the agreement provides monetary payments totaling $2.25 million to those particular employees that filed charges of discrimination against the company.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more