Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


While this blog is far from a political commentary post or analysis of related topics, the recent news of a former White House staffer that recorded conversations in the White House has caught my attention.  A recent article from The Washington Post, below, addressed some of the more nuanced discussions that have resulted over whether employees have a right to record conversations with their bosses in the workplace.  While the law can vary from state to state, this is a highly relevant article to page through.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB: Hospital Cannot Bar Off Duty Employees in Public Cafeteria From Soliciting Other Employees On Off Duty Time

Earlier this month, a three member panel of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a decision in which it found that the employer, a hospital, violated the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") when it barred off duty employees from distributing union flyers to other off duty workers in a public area.  The NLRB adopted the administrative law judge's findings that the employer had failed to establish the prohibition of off duty solicitation was necessary to avoid disruption of healthcare operations or disturbance of patients.  In failing to meet this threshold burden, the NLRB found that the employer was in violation of the Section 8(a)(1) rights of the employees.


Can An Employee Record Their Boss At Work? Possibly

Readers might have heard about former White House special assistant Omarosa Manigault Newman, after she secretly recorded Chief of Staff John Kelly terminating her work at the White House.  Questions arose, in part on whether she could lawfully record this (and other) conversations in the workplace.  Jena McGregor at The Washington Post wrote an article last week that delved into some of the nuances over workplace recording by employees.  While this is a somewhat complicated topic, McGregor's article addressed, among other matters, how certain states view the legality of "one party" recordings and whether employer policies barring recordings in the workplace runs afoul of the National Labor Relations Act.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more