Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


While this blog is far from a political commentary post or analysis of related topics, the recent news of a former White House staffer that recorded conversations in the White House has caught my attention.  A recent article from The Washington Post, below, addressed some of the more nuanced discussions that have resulted over whether employees have a right to record conversations with their bosses in the workplace.  While the law can vary from state to state, this is a highly relevant article to page through.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB: Hospital Cannot Bar Off Duty Employees in Public Cafeteria From Soliciting Other Employees On Off Duty Time

Earlier this month, a three member panel of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a decision in which it found that the employer, a hospital, violated the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") when it barred off duty employees from distributing union flyers to other off duty workers in a public area.  The NLRB adopted the administrative law judge's findings that the employer had failed to establish the prohibition of off duty solicitation was necessary to avoid disruption of healthcare operations or disturbance of patients.  In failing to meet this threshold burden, the NLRB found that the employer was in violation of the Section 8(a)(1) rights of the employees.


Can An Employee Record Their Boss At Work? Possibly

Readers might have heard about former White House special assistant Omarosa Manigault Newman, after she secretly recorded Chief of Staff John Kelly terminating her work at the White House.  Questions arose, in part on whether she could lawfully record this (and other) conversations in the workplace.  Jena McGregor at The Washington Post wrote an article last week that delved into some of the nuances over workplace recording by employees.  While this is a somewhat complicated topic, McGregor's article addressed, among other matters, how certain states view the legality of "one party" recordings and whether employer policies barring recordings in the workplace runs afoul of the National Labor Relations Act.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...