Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


While this blog is far from a political commentary post or analysis of related topics, the recent news of a former White House staffer that recorded conversations in the White House has caught my attention.  A recent article from The Washington Post, below, addressed some of the more nuanced discussions that have resulted over whether employees have a right to record conversations with their bosses in the workplace.  While the law can vary from state to state, this is a highly relevant article to page through.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB: Hospital Cannot Bar Off Duty Employees in Public Cafeteria From Soliciting Other Employees On Off Duty Time

Earlier this month, a three member panel of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a decision in which it found that the employer, a hospital, violated the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") when it barred off duty employees from distributing union flyers to other off duty workers in a public area.  The NLRB adopted the administrative law judge's findings that the employer had failed to establish the prohibition of off duty solicitation was necessary to avoid disruption of healthcare operations or disturbance of patients.  In failing to meet this threshold burden, the NLRB found that the employer was in violation of the Section 8(a)(1) rights of the employees.


Can An Employee Record Their Boss At Work? Possibly

Readers might have heard about former White House special assistant Omarosa Manigault Newman, after she secretly recorded Chief of Staff John Kelly terminating her work at the White House.  Questions arose, in part on whether she could lawfully record this (and other) conversations in the workplace.  Jena McGregor at The Washington Post wrote an article last week that delved into some of the nuances over workplace recording by employees.  While this is a somewhat complicated topic, McGregor's article addressed, among other matters, how certain states view the legality of "one party" recordings and whether employer policies barring recordings in the workplace runs afoul of the National Labor Relations Act.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more