Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Missouri Right to Work Edition


After long last, we have some finality as to the ongoing right to work fight in Missouri.  As readers are aware, this has been a long, hard fought struggle for many years.  After Missouri Republican Governor Eric Greitens signed a right to work bill into law, unions rallied to get the matter on the ballot for voters to decide whether Missouri would become the 28th right to work state.  Upon obtaining enough signatures, the matter was placed on the ballot and moved up to an August 7th vote.  Critics of the right to work law claimed this was an attempt by Republicans to move the right to work vote from the November general election, since voter turnout in August would be lower (and potentially more Republican leaning).  Nevertheless, unions and their supporters raised nearly $16 million dollars in a get out the vote effort to rally opposition to the referendum, Proposition A, and educate voters of the "dangers" of Missouri becoming the next right to work state.  Supporters of the right to work bill struggled to raise $1 million.  

As a result, heading into this past Tuesday's vote, many expected the right to work law to be defeated.  And lo and behold, that is what happened.

Below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Labor Unions Push Back With Nearly 68% Against Right to Work Law

Adam Shaw at Fox News wrote an update late Tuesday with a note that the approximately 68% vote against the right to work law was a major victory (if not a rare one) for labor unions and their supporters.  With that being said, this defeat of right to work in Missouri by a 2-1 margin has been herald by many as a turning point in the recent decline in labor unions.  While I do not know if I would call this the be all end all (in regard to a turning point), it is certainly a bright spot for labor unions and their supporters, given the downturn in union membership, growing number of right to work states, and the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Janus.



Of course, with labor unions and their supporters winning handily, supporters of the right to work referendum were left second guessing their strategy heading into Tuesday's vote and questioning why they fell short.  The St. Louis Post-Dispatch noted that many pointed to the financial disadvantage supporters of Proposition A faced:  $16 million vs. $1 million.  With such a severe financial disadvantage, supporters of the right to work struggled to organize an effective get out the vote operation, let alone educate voters about the benefits of a statewide right to work law.  Although supporters of right to work criticized a lot of the $16 million raised as "outside" or "shadow" money that improperly came into the state to influence voters, regardless of your position on the matter, quite simply...it worked.

A recent editorial from The Kansas City Star lauded the defeat of a proposition A as a victory for labor unions and an opportunity to forge a new path going forward, but cautioned labor unions not to treat Tuesday’s results as a blank check.  Instead, the editorial encourages labor unions to focus on extolling the benefits of union membership and representation to a wider group of workers and tailoring their message on issues such as trade and tariffs to appeal to the working class.  While there is no sure fire guarantee that labor unions will be able to use the defeat of right to work in Missouri as a catalyst to expanding ranks and reestablishing influence in the workplace, this just might be the shot in the arm needed to jump start things for unions in the coming years.



Since we addressed a somewhat rosy outlook for labor unions going forward in the article above, it is only fair we do the same for the other side of the aisle here.  For those on the employer/business side of the aisle looking for some positive news after Tuesday's vote, Vauhini Vara at The Atlantic predicted that while right to work may have failed in Missouri, labor unions’ victory is likely short lived.  Namely, Vara notes that the defeat of Proposition A is merely a defensive move in so much that it only maintains the status quo and does not actually make it easier for workers to unionize.  While there is still support (widespread in some areas even) for labor unions, membership has been, and continues to remain, in decline.  Whether this victory is merely a short stop in the continued decline for labor unions is anyone's guess, but Vara provides some reasoning for employers to be optimistic,  despite the result on Tuesday.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more