Skip to main content

Breaking: Democrats Drop Plans to Include Paid Leave In Proposed Tax & Spending Plan


Late this afternoon, it was announced that Democrats were dropping plans to include a planned twelve weeks of paid leave from a proposed tax and spending plan working its way through Congress.

As some readers might have heard, Congressional Democrats have been in negotiations over the size and scope of a proposed tax and spending plan for several weeks now.  While there has been broad consensus among Democrats about the need to approve a tax and spending plan while they have majority control of the House, Senate, and White House (and can approve such a measure without Republican support), the point of contention among Democrats has been about the size (and cost) of the tax and spending plan.

It has been reported that Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema have been the two Democratic hold ups in negotiations.  Both Senators Manchin and Sinema have been reported to favor a lower tax and spending plan.  In doing so, that would require something (or multiple things) to be cut from the tax and spending plan…with paid leave recently being placed on the chopping block.  While there was talk of reducing the paid leave to four weeks and some hope that paid family leave (but not paid sick leave) could survive negotiations, it appears paid leave is off the table in its entirely.

Granted, I would not call this the end of the road for those hoping that Congress approves some sort of paid leave legislation.  (After all, as recently as a few years ago, Republicans were voicing their support for paid leave.)  However, for the time being, it appears paid leave will not make it into this tax and spending plan.


For additional information:  The point of contention among Democrats has been about the size (and cost) of the tax and spending plan

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more