Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


I found this week to be tougher to narrow things down in regard to articles to highlight.  While religious exemptions and Amazon’s planned hiring increase this holiday season is noteworthy, I want to point readers toward the article which talks about preparing for an active shooter in the workplace.  Every workplace is different and no two plans will look the same, but this is an article worth a quick review.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Employees Do NOT Have to Belong to a Religious Group to Get Religious Exemption

Religious exemptions in the workplace have become a common topic over the past few months, given that some workers are asking for a religious exemption from vaccine requirements.  As this article notes, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stipulates that employers are required to reasonably accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs so long as the accommodation does not result in an undue hardship for the employer.  Notably, however, is the fact that employees are entitled to a religious accommodation even if that employee is not part of an organized religion.  (For instance, an employee can have a sincerely held religious belief under Title VII even if they are the only person that holds that religious belief.)  Going one step further, courts have also held that an employer is prohibited from denying a religious accommodation request if the employer does not believe the religious belief to be reasonable, correct, or plausible.  Finally, as this article points out, employers cannot deny a religious accommodation request even if the leader of a religious organization does not have the same belief as the employee.  (For instance, even though the Pope has stated that he does not believe the coronavirus vaccine conflicts with the teachings of the Catholic Church and therefore is not grounds for a Catholic to refuse to get the vaccine on religious grounds, employers cannot use this as a reason to deny a Catholic employee’s religious accommodation request.)  I refer readers to the entirety of the article for more information on the matter.


Planning For An Active Shooter In the Workplace

Unfortunately, in this day and age, active shooters in the workplace are an ongoing threat.  As a result, many employers have implemented active shooter training programs for their workers and new hires.  As always, every situation and workplace is different, but this article from the University of Miami provides a few tips that employers and employees alike can keep in mind to prepare for the threat of an active shooter.  For those that already have a plan in place, great!  This article is still worth reviewing.  For those that do not have a plan in place, this article is a good place to start.


Amazon Plans to Hire 150,000 Workers For Holiday Season

I mean, the title of this one really says it all…Amazon has announced an aggressive hiring push for the upcoming holiday season.  I wanted to highlight this article though more to ask the rhetorical question:  Ok, but where are all these workers going to come from?  After all, as many readers have heard, we are in the midst of a tight labor market.  With that being said, Amazon indicated it would offer bonuses up to $3,000.00 and increase pay by $3/hour in certain parts of the country in an effort to draw workers.  Will it pay off and result in the 150,000 hiring goal being met?  Maybe.  I think it will be more worthwhile to see what other employers do in an effort to match Amazon’s hiring strategy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per