Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: EEOC v. ISS Facility Services, Inc. (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division)

 

As with many labor & employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


On September 7th, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed its first lawsuit against an employer on the grounds that the employer discriminated against a disabled employee by failing to offer an accommodation by allowing the employee to work from home because of her increased risk of contracting coronavirus.

According to the complaint, ISS Facility Services, Inc. (“ISS”) employed Ronisha Moncrief (“Moncrief”) as a Health Safety & Environmental Quality Manager at one of its manufacturing facilities.  In March of 2020, Moncrief became sick at work and was subsequently diagnosed with obstructive lung disease.  Her doctor provided ISS with an accommodation request that Moncrief be allowed to work from home and take frequent breaks.

Following the spread of the coronavirus last year, ISS implemented a policy to have its workers, including Moncrief, work from home four days a week.  By June 1st of last year, ISS required its employees to work in the office five days a week.  Given her health status and risk for contracting the coronavirus, Moncrief requested an accommodation by being allowed to work from home two days a week and be allowed frequent breaks when in the office.  Despite other workers being permitted to work from home, Moncrief’s accommodation was denied.  A few weeks later, Moncrief’s supervisor recommended she be replaced and terminated due to “performance issues.”  Moncrief was subsequently terminated not long thereafter.

The lawsuit alleges that ISS violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) by failing to allow for this requested accommodation by Moncrief.  While the lawsuit is still in the very early stages of litigation, this is one to keep an eye on, given it is the first (of likely many other) ADA discrimination suits arising out fo requests to work from home as an accommodation during the coronavirus pandemic.


For a copy of the complaint:  https://aboutblaw.com/Zwy

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more