Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: EEOC v. ISS Facility Services, Inc. (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division)

 

As with many labor & employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


On September 7th, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed its first lawsuit against an employer on the grounds that the employer discriminated against a disabled employee by failing to offer an accommodation by allowing the employee to work from home because of her increased risk of contracting coronavirus.

According to the complaint, ISS Facility Services, Inc. (“ISS”) employed Ronisha Moncrief (“Moncrief”) as a Health Safety & Environmental Quality Manager at one of its manufacturing facilities.  In March of 2020, Moncrief became sick at work and was subsequently diagnosed with obstructive lung disease.  Her doctor provided ISS with an accommodation request that Moncrief be allowed to work from home and take frequent breaks.

Following the spread of the coronavirus last year, ISS implemented a policy to have its workers, including Moncrief, work from home four days a week.  By June 1st of last year, ISS required its employees to work in the office five days a week.  Given her health status and risk for contracting the coronavirus, Moncrief requested an accommodation by being allowed to work from home two days a week and be allowed frequent breaks when in the office.  Despite other workers being permitted to work from home, Moncrief’s accommodation was denied.  A few weeks later, Moncrief’s supervisor recommended she be replaced and terminated due to “performance issues.”  Moncrief was subsequently terminated not long thereafter.

The lawsuit alleges that ISS violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) by failing to allow for this requested accommodation by Moncrief.  While the lawsuit is still in the very early stages of litigation, this is one to keep an eye on, given it is the first (of likely many other) ADA discrimination suits arising out fo requests to work from home as an accommodation during the coronavirus pandemic.


For a copy of the complaint:  https://aboutblaw.com/Zwy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...